You have to your point, to both of your points. You have the physical evidence meaning the documentation, the text messages, the signed checks. You have all of the corroborating witnesses, david pecker, and now you have Michael Cohen. Is this proof beyond a reasonable doubt . Well figure that out eventually, but its all pointing in the right direction. What more do they need from Michael Cohen . Theyre going to need that direct evidence that he acted in furtherance of donald trump i think theyre going to be able to do that well with sounds like the prosecution is really doing a great job laying out the calculated narrative through Michael Cohen but then also corroborating it in a meticulous manner with the text messages. There was an objection but it was overruled. This conversation that cohen was testified to is supported by the documentary evidence. When they get to Stormy Daniels theyre going to be able to show the checks, the ledgers, all of that stuff. I think theyre doing a reall
Together. but we would send emails, texts and a lot of voice memos, voice notes. and, you know, i found that if i said kate, you know, if you love the car running with your doors open and your kids in the car on the street objection, hearsay. she is testifying about context. sustain the objection. next question. i will ask you to take a look at defendant s exhibit 209. your honor, i ll object on hearsay grounds. hearsay. may have i lay the foundation first? ms. heard, did you communicate
With kate james by email in the ordinary course of your business? yes, i did. and i am going to ask you to take a look at defendant s 209. is this a communication that was between you and kate james that was in the ordinary course of business with her as an employee? yes, it is. i will move the admission of defendant s exhibit 209. still hearsay, your honor. if there is hearsay involved inside the business record there is still objection to hearsay. the business records exception. i don t i don t agree. i think the point approach. bill: brian, you are still
Excused? yes. thank you very much, ma am. you may be excused. based upon the court s ruling submitted into evidence, state s exhibit 209. call your next witness, please. thank you, your honor. scott kerns. do you solemnly swear that the testimony you is the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth so help you god?
Destroyed and there is a brief extract or excerpt from the application or from the process rather. that s correct. in this exhibit, which is marked as 211, you are certifying here that you are the record. yes, sir. what is attached to it is a business record. yes, sir. i noticed, for example, that it s not on letterhead and it s not signed. and it doesn t have any more information on the document other than the actual written contents of it. that s correct, sir. this isn t a copy then of the actual letter that was sent in the mail. it s not the actual copy that was destroyed. that s the document that was used to create the original in