Occupied since 1067 is quite a mouthful its hard to memorize it without a nod to q but i suppose it was one of those titles that was intent to be more than just a Job Description it was i thing on purpose trying to assert this certain vision a certain view of history were there any objection to these last words of occupied since 967 at the time when they were being confirmed. Well theres that there was the general Israeli Objection to the mandate altogether but as far as i know they didnt object to the terminology of occupied territory in that context and the purpose for this typically un cumbersome way of describing the position i think reflected the worry that the person that playing the role of special rapporteur might exceed the inquiry into occupation and go more broadly into the relationship of israel and palestine and i think the Human Rights Council was trying to avoid that kind of free inquiry for under on the limited inquiry it was there and means us that are pretty lean your
Exceed the inquiry into occupation and go more broadly into the relationship of israel and palestine and i think the Human Rights Council was trying to avoid that kind of free inquiry for under the limited inquiry it was a means of set up pretty lean your freedom rather than expanding it. Yes curtailing it and also it precludes me from examining whether the palestinians were in some ways also violating human rights within the territory they administer. And i tried to change that way of thinking about the mandate but there was a strong pushback against that effort because who is a fear that if the men the description was changed the mandate itself might disappear your aunt you were at the time a prominent american scholar and International Law and yet as far as i know it was the United States on to the outgoing Bush Administration that also objected pretty strongly to your appointment perhaps because of that believe that you would be more biased towards the palestinians i wonder if the
And the purpose for this typically un cumbersome way of describing the position i think reflected the worry that the person that play the role of special rapporteur might exceed the inquiry into occupation and go more broadly into the relationship of israel and palestine and i think the Human Rights Council was trying to avoid that kind of free inquiry for under the limited inquiry it was a means of set up pretty when your freedom rather than expanding it. Yes curtailing it and also it preclude me from examining whether the palestinians were in some ways also violating human rights within the territory they administer. And i tried to change that way of thinking about the mandate but there was a strong pushback against that effort because who is a fear that if the men the description was changed the mandate itself might disappear your aunt you were at the time a prominent american scholar and International Law and yet as far as i know it was the United States on to the outgoing Bush Adm
The general Israeli Objection to the mandate altogether but as far as i know they didnt object to the terminology of occupied territory in that context and the purpose for this typically un cumbersome way of describing the position i think reflected the worry that the person that playing the role of special rapporteur might exceed the inquiry into occupation and go more broadly into the relationship of israel and palestine and i think the Human Rights Council was trying to avoid that kind of free inquiry for under on delimited inquiry but it was there and means us that are pretty lean your freedom rather than expanding it yet occurred tailing it and also it precluded me from examining whether the palestinians were in some ways also violating human rights within the territory they administer. And i tried to change that way of thinking about the mandate but there was a strong pushback against that effort because who is the fear that if the men the description was changed the mandate itse
The funds reinstate the evictions to prevent even bigger housing crisis . Mr. Speaker. The senate is grappling back into session and we continue to watch for ministers just need time at cspan. Org. Now live to the senate floor here on cspan2. Mr. Lankford mr. President. I have three requests for committees to meet during todays session of the senate. They have the approval of the majority and minority leaders. The presiding officer duly noted. Mr. Lankford mr. President , we are once again in a conversation about freedom of religion and the free exercise of religion and what that means. There is simply i would argue that it means the ability to have any faith, to have no faith at all, change your faith, and to be able to live it out. The ability to have a faith as a part of who we are. Its our most precious possession within us. Its not that. If its something less than that, the free exercise of religion has limitations on it, then its simply the freedom to worship or to have a name fa