president biden has awakened from his fever dream of last night, his nightmarish speech, which looked like it either wandered onto the set of triumph of the will or into amsterdam s red light district is all over now. today, he has no memory of it. watching all of this recalled that moment at the end of the musical seventeen seventy six when john adams prowls independence hall in frustration. is anybody down? does anybody care? does anybody see what i see? biden would probably call adams an extremist, but is anybody there? does the president even know what he s saying? you decide. i m not going to comment. you watch this. but there s no question that the republican party today is dominated, driven into mandated by donald trump in the magor, republicans. and that is a threat to this country. senator donald trump in the major republicans represent an extremism that threatens the very foundations of our republic. and magarey. republicans are there to destroy an america
federal courthouse in washington, and this is cnn hello again and welcome. it s time to break bound the big stories with some smart people today, we re asking, following this supreme court s abortion pill decision, how will it change the debate over this highly charged issue then backfire. the unexpected fallout for gun advocates from hunter biden s guilty verdict and carded the head-scratching moved by a restaurant and keep some people over 21 from eating their the panel is here and ready to go. so sit back, relax, and let s talk about up first. a major decision by the supreme court allowing the so-called abortion pill to stay on the market. what s more surprising all nine justices agreed at a time when at least one of them is under even more scrutiny for his views i don t think we ve ever had a unanimous decision on anything related to abortion. the unanimous decision, a win for abortion rights advocates but it still leaves the door open for future lawsuits against the
use disorder, also knownnown as cuddy s. joining me now to discuss, dr. marc siegel, fox news medicall i contributor. dr. siegel, thank you forbuto being here. the potencr..y has been risingr really for nearly halfly half ae a century. some concentratesntury. likes wax and wax or even boasting 100%c product. how dangerous are thest.e products and derivatives? dr. hiraman? dangerous very dangerous.even you ve been pointing out p it shis showointin the associatn with crime. pr and it s not surprising noisinwe have more evidence backing that up.et article that lancet article you talked about looked y 4000 studiesdown and narrowed it down to 20 . showed that showed a direct correlation between two things.. fi a higrst,h have concept of thc, which almostaria all marijuana has now, when we were kids, it was one point five , two percent. now it s 50% or more peopleus that use that high potency thcwt marijuana products. you know what happens? hap they get addicted much
i think some republicans were a little nervous. dr. ford was compelling. clearly seemed to be someone who experienced it some sort of trauma in her left, but judge kavanaugh came with facts, with evidence backing himself up, and he indicted the whole process here, which has been clearly mishandled, either through ineptitude or purposely by the democrats. bill: i was listening to senator ford last hour. it talking about a level of optimism that kavanaugh goes through. he based that on the private conversations that senators are having with each other. how does that work after hearing like that yesterday? yeah, well i think in votes like this, those that are historic, significant, particularly ones that have been aspects to them like this confirmation process is, senators really talk to each other. this is above the paygrade of staffers like me.
we know that michael cohen has cord recorded conversations. so this is someone saying i need to get my ducks in a row, when i tell my story, i have some sort of evidence backing me up. although that tape is sort of less substantial than the fact it was created in the first place. so gloria, what i was saying is that not recording personally conversation in the situation room was so 2017. it really is. but here is the recording i m looking for. the one that has the evidence that robert mueller needs. all of these people are recording. they re all doing the same thing. watching their back. so when that recording comes that shows obstruction of justice, or conspiracy to obstruct justice, witness intimidation, that s the recording that s floating out there and we need to hear. and that is the question. is this the tip of the iceberg of recordings? is she only representing, with this tape, the first of a series, a practice that potentially are doing in the