congress. laura: they promised the president we are going to get the wall funding, isn t that always but cannot you dangle in front of someone? we will get it later, always a million reasons you shouldn t do what the voters elected you to do. laura: your advice to him in this moment, we re going going to get into the impeachment squad, people, oh, we got him, the walls are closing around him, he got the issued, ivanka, jared, weird russians i ve never heard of, they re all named.ia what should the president do? just keep doing his job. i had the lincoln day dinner, and the crowd was huge, they were so enthusiastically president fighting for what he told them i can people he would do. what s interesting about the 811 letters mr. nadler sent, what is interesting is who he didn t send them to. all of these people, 81e
fought to get the stamp act passed, everything ivanka has done, look at the gdp, look at women s unemployment, look at minority laura: you are acting like they care about that. this is a brutal political warfare. it is, they want to take him onto his knees. laura: it is not enough to say they are harassing me. this is going to be a forward campaign of historic speeches, he is doubling down on success. i think he has to double down on the border, asylum reform, all of the stuff. okay, i m s serious about making this country even greater than it already is. and all you want to do is bring jerome corsi up to testify on capitol hill. my god. while the president is out there saving the world and he is. as far as the pointer, look at the guns. democrats want to take guns out of the hands of law-abiding citizens. yet they won t stem the flow across our border into the hands of gang membersds and drug dealers? it s unbelievable. laura: ari, you ve seen this before.
with the bare minimum requirements that they are required to follow and jamie has explained this to me, everything ivanka is doing is technically legal. i think people have been a little startled to learn just tt exactly you can get away with when you are in the white house. no one has tested the policy this way. yes, she can technically maintain ownership of the company, even though she s placed these family members in charge of the trust that are making the business decisions and she only needs to recuse herself on an individual case-by-case basis if a particular policy matter might affect her business. she does not need to step away from all china trade policy, for example. i think it s been a little shocking to people that that s allowed. could this in a broader sense be why president trump remains below 40% in approval? could it be that americans are saying, don t make a fool of me here. whether it s ivanka in this case