him and said, oh my god, he did it. i just remember screaming. probably the scariest moment my entire life. it was physically painful. it was not justice. the murders took only minutes. all these years later, the shock has yet to fade. it was a stunning time. and american legal theater. you think you might know the story of the oj simpson case, but there s a lot you probably haven t heard and seen. did nicole brown simpson actually predicts her own death? what she said to us was that oj is going to kill me. and he s going to get away with it. what went on in the jury room? not guilty of the crime of murder. all the people wanted to do was go home. in a frank interview prosecutor marsha clark answers the most important question of all. how did you not convict this guy? june 12th, 1994. brentwood, california. two horrific murders that came to be defined by just three words. the oj case. everybody seen a dramatic scene in both victims had their throats/
what, simpson is not going to get convicted. and i m going to be the one who standing by his side and he ll take care of me. kaelin told us, he cooperated fully and answered everything clark asked. and, a trial, he did detail a critical sequence of events before and after the murders. on the truth, he and simpson touch to mcdonald s for those three strange sounds he heard at 10:45 pm. sounds investigators believed simpson made when returning home after killing ron and nicole. can you demonstrate for us how loud it was? somewhat, yes. yes, go ahead. and where did that noise seem to be coming from. from the back of the wall. kato kaelin had come to hollywood looking for fame. what he found was something more powerful. longer lasting and, ultimately, upsetting. suddenly you are a key witness in a very high profile murder
like he acted with criminal intent? i think it will. i think this is kind of a game, unpleasant for both, but especially for clark. they will play it out saturday behind closed doors. he will generically assert the fifth to every question. and then the full congress will have the hard issue, do we now refer him on a not very good case, because he s invoked fifth rather than crazy claims of privilege. can i ask you a question, harry, about what they need clark for? i mean because it seems to have narrowed significantly since they have spent hours with then acting ag rosen. they know everything clark did. they have the letter he wanted them to send. it seems that clark is a witness against president trump and that s why they are pursuing him. is that a reasonable analysis? exactly. they have everything else, as you say, from donahue and from rosen. they know what he did except there is a big part of the story