Neighbor. I want the board to understand that i am here not representing just myself but 94 people that signed a petition opposing the permit. We are putting a picture on the overhead. This is the picture of the existing permit on my backyard and the white house in the foreground. One reason that i purchased my house 28 years ago, because i was captivated by the tranquillity of the open space in the rear yard. On march 9, i sought a permit and it was not mentioned the size or level. And later it was mentioned for the deck to be built on the second floor and would protrude 16 feet from the wall and it would be creating a massive deck of 250 square foot and stairs of 150 square feet. The whole project would be 18 feet from the rear wall from where my lot line begins. The project will be on my rear lot line and thus creating massive intrusion in my living space. To give you context this massive deck is larger than some newly constructed condos. Though the planning code allows the project
There that i can afford. Compared to what i was paying rent there. Sorry and its crazy to think that you guys can just, that something can get passed and make us all leave like that. We need Affordable Housing in San Francisco. And you guys should uphold your original decision. Thats it. Thank you. Any other Public Comments . Okay, seeing none commissioners the matter is submitted. The question that has been raised is whether the discussion and or findings and our comments related to what portion of the permit that we found to be defective. The and i freely admit that historically our board has had some very articulate people representative s representatives, and i probably am not one of those. However, what i was attempting to say during the course of our deliberation the permit needs to have provided a clear picture of what the scope of work was going to be. My comments dont necessarily relate just to the legal description as by the permit. If you look at the body of the permit, it w
Overhead. This is the picture of the existing permit on my backyard and the white house in the foreground. One reason that i purchased my house 28 years ago, because i was captivated by the tranquillity of the open space in the rear yard. On march 9, i sought a permit and it was not mentioned the size or level. And later it was mentioned for the deck to be built on the second floor and would protrude 16 feet from the wall and it would be creating a massive deck of 250 square foot and stairs of 150 square feet. The whole project would be 18 feet from the rear wall from where my lot line begins. The project will be on my rear lot line and thus creating massive intrusion in my living space. To give you context this massive deck is larger than some newly constructed condos. Though the planning code allows the project for the setback and 9 feet high. I am appealing the permit because its not consistent with open space and doesnt respect adjacent neighbors. In fact the project disregards the
It took me a long time to find housing. Sorry, can you speak more into the mic. Yeah sorry, i have looked at housing and there is nothing out there that i can afford. Compared to what i was paying rent there. Sorry and its crazy to think that you guys can just, that something can get passed and make us all leave like that. We need Affordable Housing in San Francisco. And you guys should uphold your original decision. Thats it. Thank you. Any other Public Comments . Okay, seeing none commissioners the matter is submitted. The question that has been raised is whether the discussion and or findings and our comments related to what portion of the permit that we found to be defective. The and i freely admit that historically our board has had some very articulate people representative s representatives, and i probably am not one of those. However, what i was attempting to say during the course of our deliberation the permit needs to have provided a clear picture of what the scope of work wa
In the rear yard. On march 9, i sought a permit and it was not mentioned the size or level. And later it was mentioned for the deck to be built on the second floor and would protrude 16 feet from the wall and it would be creating a massive deck of 250 square foot and stairs of 150 square feet. The whole project would be 18 feet from the rear wall from where my lot line begins. The project will be on my rear lot line and thus creating massive intrusion in my living space. To give you context this massive deck is larger than some newly constructed condos. Though the planning code allows the project for the setback and 9 feet high. I am appealing the permit because its not consistent with open space and doesnt respect adjacent neighbors. In fact the project disregards the neighbors. And the adjacent neighbor and quote. The neighbor that designed this phase is incorrect. And the neighbors were only aware after the permit was approved. End quote. Notice there is no second floors in the adja