Stay updated with breaking news from Eugene volokh. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
About a fascinating book. It was a fasting book about a fascinating case, National Federation of independent business is versus sebelius, better known as the obamacare case. As i read this book i thought that i was really watching some very, very smart people who obviously respect each other but youre in no way, shape, or form shy about challenging each other, and they would advance and refine their arguments as the book progressed covering many facets of the obamacare case, some of which they will discuss today. I will introduce all of the speakers anywhere in which they will speak it will start off with trevor burrus. Trevor was the editor of a conspiracy against obamacare. He is a Research Fellow at the Cato Institute center for conscious constitutional studies where his interests include constitutional law, civ ....
Liberty a minute. Repo book and join the conversation, go to booktv. Org and click on book club to enter the chat room. Next on booktv from the Heritage Foundation in washington, d. C. , a discussion on the legal arguments against the Affordable Care act. Trevor burrus, editor of the book and a panel, all law professors and bloggers for the volokh conspiracy website, talk about the impact of the arguments on the obama to debate, both in public and in the courts. This is about an hour 15. Thank you much for being here, and i applaud you hardy souls who braved the cold weather today in order to be here. We are here today with several distinct which panelists to talk about a fascinating book. It was a fascinating about a fascinating case of National Federation of independent business is versus sebelius, better kn ....
Be, this project will be blocked because it interferes with my view, or things like that. Sometimes people would show up and they would say this is destructive of the culture of the neighborhood, for a variety of reasons. And you have to, i believe, review the input but also believe its not necessarily last source of wisdom. So you need it and thats one of the reasons the Environmental Review is a great because its so destructive because it gets facts on the table, allows the debate to happen. But the community shouldnt make the final decision because then the common good gets killed. Someone has to be looking at both the views of interest and, good to make the final decision. Youre talking about someone who represents the community would still have the guts, is that what youre talking about . In the case of new york city, lets say the mayor, so not just the community. If you have team unitybased decisionmaking solely, many ....