many of those lies are well documented. we know that mr. santos hide about his education, both graduate and post graduate. claiming that he attended universities where he was never enrolled. claiming that he obtained degrees that he did not earn. we know that mr. santos lied about his employment when he claimed that he worked for two prestigious financial institutions, citi group and goldman sachs. we know that mr. santos lied about his religious faith, when he said he was jewish, and when called out meant to say that he was jew-ish. and we know he lied when he said four employees killed in a mass shooting in florida. mr. speaker, while troubling, those lies did not justify his removal from this body. but these and other misleading statements reflect directly on mr. santos s credibility. in may, mr. speaker. george santos said that he looked forward to seeing the ethics process play out. and that if the committee finds reason to remove them, then that is the process. today, m
At least on the house side, and i believe the senate side is following suit in coming up with a uniform set of policies to establish what is sexual harassment and what is not. so until all the people up on capitol hill get on the same page when it comes to that, sometimes it s hard to differentiate between what is and isn t, you know, harassment and whether it s true or not. if we move to the politics side of it, the politization of this very topic, if i can say it, do democrats feel like maybe we went too far because of franken leaving, but we have others like farenthold who are not resigning? and that s a good question, because at the same time that franken decided to resign, i mean, some of his colleagues, including west virginia senator joe manchin said, i don t know if he should be resigning, he should let the ethics process