them strictly speaking, to do with them or with america that effort began many years earlier. winnipegger to july twenty second, 2016. that s the day that wikileaks published thousands of emailsrso from the servers ofe the democratic national committee in washington. democratl commit those emailst party officials had rigged the democratic process,s, the primary process in favor of hillary clinton and againstrgen the insurgent populist candidate. that year, bernie sanders ofpo vermont. within days, the chair of the dnc, debbie wasserman schultz,he chair resigned in di the wikileaks scandal brokee win the same day that hillary clinton shows her on the same day that hillary clinton chose her running mate, senator tim kaine, in ang overshadowmar tim kaand it the g convention that followed. but more significantlyed.,s scan the wikileaks scandal threatened to split the democratic party into piecesdait the d. more than 13 million bernie the ers voters, many young people learned tha
This is at the moment not the issue of. Tenure kramer reporting from gaza for us tania thank you very much. More of this story now with yosef yani hes the head of the Berlin Bureau of the European Council on Foreign Relations thank you for joining us in our studio is that weve seen very Strong International reaction here as we said a South African and turkey recalling their ambassadors and we should say the u. K. Said quote the large volume of live fire is extremely concerning were also seeing this u. N. Security Council Special meeting what can all of this actually do International Leaders are trying to signal to the Israeli Government that this is critical that their response is fueling the fire rather than controlling it and they are also deeply concerned particularly the europeans that now this leads to another period of hardening between the two sides which means there will be no progress whatsoever on any type of a negotiated solution between israelis and palestinians but will ex
states. i think that is what that differentiation there is. i think what has been interesting so far this morning is that most of the international reaction, notjust the europeans and the americans, but also further afield around the world, most of the reaction has been simply to say, we need to de escalate, we need calm heads, we need restraint. there has been no direct criticism or attribution of responsibility to israel. the one exception to that, comments made by oman, where they have very close relations with the iranians, and they have actually condemned what they have actually condemned what they said were israel s attacks on iran. i they said were israel s attacks on iran. ., ., . i. iran. i might have to cut you off there. iran. i might have to cut you off there- mr iran. i might have to cut you off there. mr blank iran. i might have to cut you off there. mr blank and iran. i might have to cut you off there. mr blank and is - iran. i might have to cut you off there. mr bla
were being laid down effectively to try to limit russia s access to battlefield materials, again trying to weaken russia militarily but of course there is a big difference, isn t there, between putting sanctions in and making sure that they stick. lots of countries have gone down the route of economically restrict in russia but we know is that there are ways of getting around this there are loopholes russia is exploiting using third party countries, countries in central asia have been accused of helping russia evade sanctions so tightening things there is going to be a priority. we haven t had any official communications, i think if you pay pose attention to the language when these sorts of things come out in the next few days we will get an indication ofjust how days we will get an indication of just how strong days we will get an indication ofjust how strong these sanctions are going to be and how united g7 partners are, both the us aside from washington, the europeans and also japan