Something called the u. S. Fda. It is the one year anniversary. Could you remind people about not only what the new trade agreement is, but what brought on its, i guess, what led to it being created? caller: a number of forces there. Basically this is a revised version of the north american free trade agreement that was in effect beginning in january, 1994. That agreement was negotiated in 1991 or 1992 and in many respects was seriously out of date. There also was a lot of political opposition to nafta on both sides of the aisle, and the previous administration, some logic that a new version would be attractive to a wide swath of members of congress, members of the public as well. Host: some of the specifics of the usmca, ordinance for cars and trucks, protection for property, it would strengthen labor and environmental protection, would have protections for financial institutions, and increase what are the notables compared to the new agreement? caller: i think the most important gues
Down and really strategizing where to go from here, how to reach those last americans who are either hesitant to get the vaccine or are struggling to access it for other reasons. And certainly your hearing this shift. From where we were at the beginning of the vexing campaign, focused on mass fax sites, getting this out quickly and efficiently, you are switching you are getting it through family doctors and pharmacies, places that are easily accessed, maybe to answer questions. Host: when it comes to those who are hesitant today, how would you categorize those groups? guest: i think it is hard to put them under one umbrella. Simply because you have people with personal concerns. But certainly you could break them down. Maybe into a few groups. There are certainly some people who might be a little hesitant but they might be willing in the future to get it. And in might be dependent on the trusted messenger. There are some people who said they don t want to get it. The kaiser family foun
these issues with tax credits, and medicaid expansion. so who this proposal that is under lock and key, who proposed it, and who gets to look at it right now? you know, i m not sure if i can speak to who exactly is in charge of writing it, but i do know that members of the energy and commerce committee, the gop members, are able to go look at it right now from what i ve been seeing both on twitter and other reports is that they re not able to make copies of it. because they re worried about leaks. but those i think are who is looking at it yesterday. so they have jurisdiction over repealing it and putting a replacement in there. what other committees do? how is it going to work next week when this legislation is marked up? we just heard majority leader kevin mccarriage wrikarnlcarthy to be like any other bill. there are issues with the ways and means committee. i m not an expert in rules. from what other legislation i ve seen, it probably will go through the enc com
inspector general roth. you are now recognized for five minutes. mr. roth: thank you, chairman chaffetz, ranking member cummings, and members of the committee. thank you for letting me testify relating to tsa. the inspector oversight of tsa fosters positive change and makes government better. our effectiveness of our oversight depends on our ability to make balanced reports that accurately includes findings and recommendations to resolve. the inspector general act requires us we inform the d.h.s. secretary, congress and the public about any problems and deficiencies we identify through our work. public scrutiny in what we find is key to accomplishing our mission. we have found that tsa has a history of taking an aggressive approach to restricting information from being made public, especially with respect to a category of information known as sensitive security information, commonly known by its acronym as ssi. this problem is well-documented. i first encountered the issue in
202-748-8000. republicans, 202-748-8001. independence 202-748-8002. join the conversation at twitter @cspanwj or go to facebook facebook.com/c-span. this is the headline in the new york times comes sticking with crop, republicans resist calls for wider russia inquiries, this is what the speaker of the house had to say about it yesterday. we have seen no evidence from ongoing investigations that anybody in the trump campaign was involved in this. we have earned presented with no evidence of americans come escalating with the russians. we are still doing investigations come in the house and senate, the intelligence committees have been investing this and intelligence community is, not the committees by the communities, did an investigation after the election and gave us the results of that investigation before the inauguration. the house intelligence committee just finished its oversight plan to continue investigations. we will always make sure we are protecting our source