to have said all i need you to do is to find me 11,000 votes unchanged. i think if you look at that context it is pretty clear that petitioner is acting in the capacity of office seeker, not as president i am focus on the legal test. i am not hearing any objections to it. other than i think the d.c. circuit place more content consideration off limit then i went. i want to understand on the court immunity, or whatever word we use, it seems to me that we are narrowing the ground of dispute here considerably. do we look at motives? the president s motives for his actions? for example, he has lots of power as we ve discussed, but he might use them to enhance his election in his personal interest. it is not a relevant consideration when we look at core powers? i think of this more as looking at the objectives of the activity as opposed to the subjective motives in the sense that you are i think there is concern about seeing a electoral motive to be reelected as such. e
up my constitutional rights have been taken away from a. but every single expert, every legal scholar, ever respected scholar has said this is no case, there is no case here. this is just a political witch hunt. election interference this is the way they think they will get elected but i guess based on what i am looking at john: former president donald trump sounding off on his way into court this morning as a third day of testimony underway in his new york criminal trial. i am john roberts in washington we will be watching this for the next two hours. b2 what a day it is i m sandra smith in new york this is america report. the prosecution picking up where it left off on tuesday with more questions for experts witness david fentanyl the national enquirer reported telling about trump s alleged affair with karen mcdougal and the efforts to give that from going public. john: the manhattan d.a. s office also accusing president trump of violating the court s gag order ag