each other would certainly lead investigators for drink a to determine what if any, motivation existed, but why his life was taken. okay? and then what s also being publicly revealed is that there s other evidence that look like agitators, you know, prior to his stabbing court documents showing that many sister checked in only sometime, you know that evening after the disagreement by texting, you know, just want to make sure you re doing okay? because i know neema came way down hard on you. ah how will that kind of evidence be used to help build the prosecutor s case? yes so fredricka. it s important to understand that in any prosecution, particularly here where you have a murder prosecution, which simply means that you are you intended to kill someone you didn t have the justification to do it. a motive is not an element of the crime. what does that mean? it means that in the event that this went
the boy and take him away from the table. you can imagine how scary this was, though. he was able to continue to compete even after his little finger was put in a cast. joining us now is assistant professor from the university of michigan and core faculty at their robotics institute, neema. what do you think of this? yes, the boy made another move but that s what little kids do. hi, good morning. thank you for having me on. you re absolutely right. this is common. people tend to overtrust robotics systems. what you expect as a child, he gets excited, he s going to do something and the robot was not expecting it, clearly. whoever decided to put this robot there, they made a huge mistake. this is really not the kind of robotic system you should be putting around people, especially children. you guys are being to calm about this. this is like where the