Live Breaking News & Updates on Endering Him Psychologically Incapacitated From Complying With Fundamental Marital Obligations To His Wife

MANILA - The Court of Appeals (CA) has turned down a physician's petition to reconsider the annulment of his marriage of 35 years as the alleged condition of psychological incapacity was not convincing. Dr. Noel Fabian's previous annulment case was denied by the Imus, Cavite Regional Trial Court Branch 22 in 2017 and subsequently upheld by the CA on May 11. In his motion for reconsideration, Fabian said he preferred to be with his friends than to spend time with his family; indulged in extra-marital affairs; and would always be dominant and controlling of his wife. He said those are instances that are "serious and clearly demonstrative of his inability to recognize the significance of marriage". He presented a psychiatric report showing that he has Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorder, rendering him psychologically incapacitated from complying with fundamental marital obligations to his wife, with whom he has three children. The court did not find the doctor' ....

Cavite City , Noel Fabian , Cavite Regional Trial Court Branch , Obsessive Compulsive Personality Disorder , Manila The Court Of Appeals Ca Has Turned Downa Physician 39s Petition To Reconsider Annulment His Marriage 35 Years As Alleged Condition Psychological Incapacity Was Not Convincing Dr Noel Fabian Previous Case Denied By Imus , Avite Regional Trial Court Branch 22 In 2017 And Subsequently Upheld By The Ca On May 11 His Motion For Reconsideration , Abian Said He Preferred To Be With His Friends Than Spend Time Family Indulged In Extra Marital Affairs And Would Always Dominant Controlling Of Wife Those Are Instances That Quot Serious Clearly Demonstrative Inability Recognize The Significance Marriage Presenteda Psychiatric Report Showing Has Obsessive Compulsive Personality Disorder , Endering Him Psychologically Incapacitated From Complying With Fundamental Marital Obligations To His Wife , Ith Whom He Has Three Children The Court Did Not Find Doctor 39s Arguments Convincing Quot As This Sees It , Etitioner Appellant 39s Preference To Be With His Friends , Nfidelity And Dominant Attitude Towards His Wife Do Not Rise To The Level Of Psychological Incapacity That Would Justify Nullification Parties 39 Marriage , Uot It Said Added That Psychological Incapacity Quot Refers Only To The Most Serious Cases Of Personality Disorders Clearly Demonstrative An Utter Insensitivity Or Inability Give Meaning And Significance Marriage We Reiterate Irreconcilable Differences , Exual Infidelity Or Perversion , Motional Immaturity And Irresponsibility The Like , O Not By Themselves Warranta Finding Of Psychological Incapacity As The Same May Only Be Due Toa Person 39s Refusal Or Unwillingness To Assume Essential Obligations Marriage , Uot The Decision Read Pna ,