India’s prime minister has been accused of “desperately raking up” a decades-old island dispute in a bid to win over more voters in southern India ahead of the elections this month.
losing few elections. republicans losing i few elections. republicans losing. i expect to see a lot of losing. ! expect to see a lot of that losing. i expect to see a lot of that from losing. i expect to see a lot of that from ron desantis but also others. that from ron desantis but also others, like chris christie and others others, like chris christie and others coming to the race. mike pence set others coming to the race. mike pence set to others coming to the race. mike pence set to announce - others coming to the race. mike pence set to announce his i others coming to the race. ij i «1s pence set to announce his intention to run on wednesday. we learned that yesterday. lining up all of his policy and plans. it is a really crowded race, but the pencil and is interesting, because it puts them head to head with his former boss? absolutely. it is going to be interesting to see. if all of these people interesting to see. if all of these people end up on the same
they have very little to say to each other. i mean, the whole thing is just the whole thing is just tragic, obviously. look, there s no right to privacy in a prison. these calls are constantly recorded. it s interesting that that s part of it, because we get to see the dynamic. what s interesting to me, anderson, what i m going to be looking for when the jurors are actually interviewed, they may very well say, look, we don t know if that was the motive, nor do we even give it that much weight. what we do know is, he s the guy that did it. i think at the end of the day, that s what matters. because every lawyer will tell you that motive just doesn t have to be proven, is not an element of the crime. yes, inquiring minds, jurors want to know. but you don t have to establish that. i want to hear what they have to say about that motive issue. maggie murdaugh s sister took the stand, marian proctor. i want to play some of her testimony. she loved her family, she loved her boys. wh
waech away. when i first started looking at this and what they don t know out there in tv land, we don t coordinate these thoughts. we ve all looked at this independently. when i first looked at it, the motive jumped out at me. it does not make sense that a guy s going to murder his wife and his son to distract from a financial crimes investigation? i mean, this guy s a lawyer he d take the hit on the financial crimes. it s a much more defensive scenario in a white collar case. as you re talking about it. i haven t even gotten to the point yet, the real point. i want to tell you something as the prosecution team and the defense, talk to me about this. what s jumping out to this jury is the motive issue. what s jumping out is the financial fraud trial that was in the middle of all of this and the idea of minutia, the devil being in the details. is the devil in the details helpful to this case? and i think it is because this is someone, all the experts have told us that is a true
very narrow window to accomplish all that it cuts both ways. if alex did do it, to kill two people, clean up all the evidence and leave, that s where the prosecution is alleging. so either way, it s not clear how all this was done in such a short amount of time, whoever the guilty party is. final thought, prosecution not obligated to prove motive. but the jurors and the public, we want to know. why? how? why would he have done this? i don t see the consistency in the motive issue. i think they put on a very compelling case, but does it sennecessarily follow that you l your wife and your young son because the financial walls are closing in? that s where the defense has made that argument and said, look, we concede. the jury has heard from its own matt mouth. he acknowledges a lot of