the texas supreme court reversing a ruling that allowed kate cox to get an emergency abortion. she had no other option to leave the state to get an abortion. she had the option, many, many women are trapped in their seats. ukrainian president zelenskyy to the white house and to capitol hill as delays for more aid are continuing in congress. the prospects of this getting done before the calendar year is up looks not good right now. the free world hesitates, that s when dictatorships celebrate. good morning, everyone. i m phil mattingly with poppy harlow in new york. we start with an extraordinary request from the special counsel in the election subversion case against donald trump. jack smith, special prosecutor, wants an answer from the supreme court, on whether the president is immune from prosecution and he wants it as soon as possible. smith went directly to the high court, specially leapfrogging what could have been a very lengthy appeals process. it c
new internal g.o.p. spending rules, which they hope will sort of blow up the whole spending culture and impose them on the appropriations committee as well. paul: what did kingston mean he when he says destroy the infrastructure to spending, what would that mean specifically? it would mean, first of all, no ear marking in the way that it was done and spending more of what we have rather than what you just write checks that congress has done and republicans know how to this well in the tom delay aria, the biggest ear marks exploded the numbers with ear marks, but also talking about doing away with emergency spending bills, catch-all bills where you dump everything in and talking about restoring rules for automatic across the board cuts like they had in the 1980 s, if you have, congress exceeds certain spending levels they ve said at the beginning of the congress. it sounds to me like a pretty
officers and firefighters who actually will be there on the job because of this bill. the republicans have been insisting that every single spending measure be paid for, even the emergency spending bills like the extension of the unemployment insurance, the long-term unemployment bills and such. but this thing is paid for. is there any valid criticism of it, other than perhaps it s not doing enough? no. i mean this is paid for. the idea that republicans or anybody would criticize this bill because it closes loopholes for multi national corporations that want to send jobs abroad is absolutely ludicrous. the congressional budget office and the cbo has been a very good neutral arbiter, says that not only is this entirely paid for, but it actually reduces the long-term budget deficit. the larger ongoing issue of unemployment, what is your analysis of it? what s your forecast? what more needs to be done? oh, keith, i wish i could be upbeat about this. i really want to be. friday we
classrooms. you ve got tens of thousands of sanitation workers and police officers and firefighters who actually will be there on the job because of this bill. the republicans have been insisting that every single spending measure be paid for, even the emergency spending bills like the extension of the unemployment insurance, the long-term unemployment bills and such. but this thing is paid for. is there any valid criticism of it, other than perhaps it s not doing enough? no. i mean this is paid for. the idea that republicans or anybody would criticize this bill because it closes loopholes for multi national corporations that want to send jobs abroad is absolutely ludicrous. the congressional budget office and the cbo has been a very good neutral arbiter, says that not only is this entirely paid for, but it actually reduces the long-term budget deficit. the larger ongoing issue of unemployment, what is your analysis of it? what s your forecast? what more needs to be done? oh, k
sanitation workers and police officers and firefighters who actually will be there on the job because of this bill. the republicans have been insisting that every single spending measure be paid for, even the emergency spending bills like the extension of the unemployment insurance, the long-term unemployment bills and such. but this thing is paid for. is there any valid criticism of it, other than perhaps it s not doing enough? no. i mean, this is paid for. the idea that republicans or anybody would criticize this bill because it closes loopholes for multinational corporations that want to send jobs abroad is absolutely ludicrous. the congressional budget office, and the cbo has been a very good neutral arbiter, says that not only is this entirely paid for, but it actually reduces the long-term budget deficit. the larger ongoing issue of unemployment, what is your analysis of it? what s your forecast? what more needs to be done? oh, keith, i wish i could be upbeat about this.