Live Breaking News & Updates on Elliot Louis

Affordable nonconforming use. The masonic temple prevail at the appeal at the verdict of mandate. Less the eir already did cover the possibility that an amendment special use district would be necessary however we did prevail at the court of appeal and the final eir actively approved that. The physical impacts on the environment of a project. Not the form of projects approval. The ceqa guidelines to find a project analyzed in the eir in the activity being proposed not the approvals. Therefore even if the appellants are correct, they would have no bearing on the adequacy of the ei r. Let me turn to the section of the 182 argument which applies citywide is not available in the knob hill special use district. We agree with the appellants that the provision of a special use district supercede general code Planning Commission provision when there is a conflict with any other code provision. Appellants can point to no conflict betw ....

United States , District Of Columbia , San Francisco , Steve Vettel , David Elliot Louis , David Chiu , Court Appeal , Planning Commission , Case Authority , Code Section , Court Judicial , Planning Department , Planning Department Board , Department Board , Live Nation , David Elliot , Elliot Louis , Little Red , Red Box , Box End , Settlement Agreement , Hill Association , Association Oldest , Board Chair , Service Beverage , Business Owner ,