meanwhile, ayatollah khamenei ruled out negotiations with the united states on a nuclear agreement. jeffrey goldberg, national correspondent for the the atlantic and national recipient for the award for reporting. pleased to have you. welcome. jeffrey: thank you. charlie: while i have been away, not much has happened. i want to talk about the issue of migrants. the pope is speaking to it, the president spoke in the last 24 hours. we ll talk about that, but, first, where are we? it s apparent that the president has enough democratic support. jeffrey: it s all over but there is a lot of shouting. the republicans are trying to engineer various last-minute maneuvers to try to sink the deal or delay the deal, there s this whole maneuver republicans are suggesting. some of them are arguing the deal doesn t exist because they were supposed to have seen all the provisions of the deal and there are side agreements, the atomic energy agency, that they haven t seen because no one s se
we know he is not even american. anyway, we have training camps. where they want to kill us. when do we get rid of them? that s my question. mr. trump: we will be looking at a lot of different things. a lot of people are saying bad things are happening out there and plenty of other things. mark: that mysterious question and he also said other offensive things in his question to trump that mr. trump did not address directly. then there is the story that he was not accurate at the debate on wednesday when he denied jeb bush s claim he tried to get casino gambling in florida. taking a lot of heat from other candidates. phil, as we head into the weekend, can either of these two things bring about what the establishment desperately wants, the beginning of the end of donald j. trump? phil: predicting the end of trump has been a great way to look like a fool. angave the establishment incident they can point to. these people that donald trump is attracting to the campaign, we don t w
we know he is not even american. anyway, we have training camps. where they want to kill us. when do we get rid of them? that s my question. mr. trump: we will be looking at a lot of different things. a lot of people are saying bad things are happening out there and plenty of other things. mark: that mysterious question also said other offensive things in his question to trump that mr. trump did not address directly. then there is the story that he was not accurate at the debate on wednesday when he denied jeb bush s claim he tried to get casino gambling passed in the state of florida. taking a lot of heat from other candidates. phil, as we head into the weekend, can either of these two things bring about what the establishment desperately wants, the beginning of the end of donald j. trump? phil: predicting the end of trump has been a great way to look like a fool. but if they can make clear what they have been saying behind the scenes for a while, these people that donald tr
factors on inflation will be transitory. however, the recent additional decline in oil prices and further appreciation of the dollar mean that it will take a bit more time for these effects fully dissipate. charlie: joining me now is glenn hubbard, the dean at columbia business school, a top republican economic advisor. gillian tett is u.s. managing editor at the financial times. alan blinder is a professor at princeton university and a former fed vice chairman. david leonhardt of the new york times will be joining us. he has joined us now. i am pleased to have him as well. alan, give me a sense of what happened today. and what might these deliberations have been like? alan: i think they were contentious and a polite sort of way. everything is polite. the committee is divided. from the statement, you can tell clearly that janet yellen was on the dovish side and was in her own polite way not getting resistance. there was no little bone thrown to the hawks in this statement.
scott: you ride to the polls, you raise more money, you publicize how much money you ,aise, you get to the debates you rise in the polls. he did the opposite. worsening poll numbers, worsening fundraising, and horrible candidate performance. ours i believe a friend of , mississippi former governor, likes to say the good get better and the bad gets worse. there is no doubt it has been bad for scott walker for a while . once you are in that downward spiral it is hard to get out of it. we think of politics as political athleticism, are you able to play in the major league cf can you think back on 2008 when people thought mitt romney on paper was going to be the nominee. skills.have the scott walker is in that same mold. great on paper, not great actually out there. just didn t have what it took to play at a big league level. scott: he did poorly in the first and had to do better in the second. walker gettingt inconsistent answers, not showing growth as a candidate. he could try