and trump administration. and the immigration law is taking effect into florida. we could have extreme consequences. just one of 200 new laws in the state that could change peoples lives. that is coming up. lgbtq rights advocates are condemning one of yesterday s key decisions from the supreme court. the court sided with a colorado web designer who said she had a first amendment right to refuse service to same-sex couples. in the majority opinion justice gorsuch wrote the tolerance, not coercion, is our nations answer. the first amendment envisions the united states of a rich and complex place where all persons are free to think and speak as they wish, not as the government demands. in her dissenting opinion justice sotomayor called the decision heartbreaking. compared it to discrimination that blacks faced before the civil rights movement. she writes, quote, the immediate symbolic effect to the decision is to marquise and that means for a second class status. in this way, th
hi, everyone. an extraordinary revelation by a judge who said he found compelling evidence that donald trump may have committed crimes of adding a new dimension to trump s legal jeopardy and reminder after incredible reporting and after more than a year of an intense investigative probe by congress, there is still more that we don t know and more to learn about the details of the trump plan. as we reported on this show yesterday, in a ruling ordering attorney general john eastman to hand over dozens of his e-mails to the january 6 committee, the federal judge says that eastman s clients, that is donald trump, signed a legal document describing evidence of election fraud that he knew was false. the new york times has more on carter s ruling. he knew the specific numbers of voter fraud were wrong but continued to tout those numbers. both in court and to the public judge carter wrote. he added in a footnote that the suit contained language saying mr. trump was relying on infor
Slowed the prosecution and asked trump friendly questions about potential problems with prosecuting a president. If you listened to that argument or read about it, you may have noticed it almost sounded like that kind of trial was a futile project. While up the east coast and actual trial of an actual former president was Going Forward and the republic did not crumble. It is a contrast that hangs over all of this in america and what we are going to get into tonight in this first week of the new york trial. It seems to undercut the suppose it concern of the trump appointed justices that hypothetically, someday, somehow, in the future trials of president s are a very bad thing, when they are actually already happening. The first week of this trial shows not only that it is possible, but also gave us the first evidence backed, in court, binding version of the d. A. S story and we put together a brisk ride through what we are learning. The prosecution in Donald Trumps Hush Money Trial Drew
Welcome to are special, new york versus donald trump. We are going to get into this criminal trial. The first week of testimony in new york. We are covering that on tonights special. New reporting on the testimony. Experts from law to the sordid world of new york tabloids. We also have a Beat Special Report on the new, separate indictment against a trump lawyer who first admitted his role in the now indicted plot. This weekends with a remarkable contrast from d. C. To new york. In washington, you may have noticed a trumpfriendly Supreme Court, slow jack smith prosecution and asked a bunch of friendly questions about the potential problems with prosecuting a president. If you listen to that oral argument, you may have noticed it almost sounded like that kind of trial was a futile project. File right at the east coast, an actual trial of an actual former president was Going Forward in the republic did not crumble. It is a contrast that hangs over all of this in america and what we are go
Welcome to our special new york versus donald trump. Im ari melber and we are going to get into this criminal trial. Were covering that tonight in the course of this hour. Well have new reporting on the damning testimony, experts from law to the sorted world of new york tabloids. We have experts on that, too, believe it or not. We also tonight have a Beat Special Report on a new separate indictment on a trump lawyer, Boris Epstein, who first admitted his role on the beat. To hear all of that tonight. This weekends with a remarkable contrast from d. C. To new york. Let me tell you what i mean. In Washington A Trump Friendly Court asked trump friendly questions about all of the problems with prosecuting a president. If you read about it, it almost sounded like that kind of trial was a futile project. While right up the east coast an actual trial of an actual former president was Going Forward and the republic did not crumble. It is a contrast that hangs over all of this in america and th