with biden beating trump. in fact, in my hypothetical biden beats trump by the exact same numbers that biden did be trump. in the electoral college is 306 to 2 32 in the popular vote percentage. it s still 51.3 to 46.9, meaning joe biden garnered 81 million votes and donald trump 74 million only in my alternate universe. trump accepts defeat. there s no perfect call to brad raffensperger. john eastman. he never gets near the oval office . mike pence is not leaned on. no alternative slates of electors are ever assembled. january, 6th. it passes like any other day. there s no rally. there s no storming of the capital. and on january 20 donald and melania trump. they attend the biden harris inauguration. there, there. he s not happy about it. he s grumpy. but he s physically there. and as a matter of fact, when the inauguration of biden and harris is concluded, trump boards, marine one he does that loop around the mall, and he heads to andrews. he boards air force one for the fi
is expected to spend the night on monday in anticipation of his tuesday arraignment. it goes something like this. i want you to assume that the 2020 election concludes with biden beating trump. in fact, in my hypothetical biden beats trump by the exact same numbers that biden did be trump. in the electoral college is 306 to 2 32 in the popular vote percentage. it s still 51.3 to 46.9, meaning joe biden garnered 81 million votes and donald trump 74 million only in my alternate universe. trump accepts defeat. there s no perfect call to brad raffensperger. john eastman. he never gets near the oval office . mike pence is not leaned on. no alternative slates of electors are ever assembled. january, 6th. it passes like any other day. there s no rally. there s no storming of the capital. and on january 20 donald and melania trump. they attend the biden harris inauguration. there, there. he s not happy about it. he s grumpy. but he s physically there. and as a matter of fact, when th
this is monday, april 22nd. this is fox & friends. opening arguments begin this morning in former president trump s hush money trial. grow increasingly skeptic of the prosecution s case. i think this whole case is ultimately going to crumble because it doesn t work under the law and especially under the facts. ainsley: plus, anti-israel chaos on columbia university s campus pushes classes online today. [chanting free, free palestine] ainsley: two columbia students are going to join us this hour. will: new polls show biden trailing trump on critical issues as one a-lister says biden s age isn isn t an issue. the people that i talk to and everybody that i have say he s as sharp as a tack. brian: ha. lawrence: that s funny. the second hour of fox & friends starts right now and, remember, mornings are better with friends. ainsley: we start with a fox news alert. classes at columbia university will be virtual today as pro-palestinian student workers are plannin
Falsifying of business records, it s a misdemeanor, 1 through 3 years depending on what state you are in. the only way that bragg revived this is by bootstrapping it s a felony saying well they falsified these records to conceal underlying crime, but the question is how do they do that and who did it? did trump do it? did michael cohen do it and what was the underlying crime. bragg said in a press conference they violated state and federal election law except the problem is doj declined to bring the federal election law charge against trump. i think they are going to focus on the fact that, again, he didn t even know how these were labeled and, two, even if he did, what s the problem? will: let me see if i can summarize this that i understand it completely. so, to ainsley s point, making these payments under the guise of nda isn t illegal. they make it illegal by calling it bookkeeping fraudulent activity when which by the way you point out statute run on that misdemeanor. bragg says
He be facing this indictment from manhattan? d a. alvin bragg in connection with stormy daniels and hush money? and if you re answering that question with a no then what does that say about this indictment? maybe that it s an effort to thwart his current candidacy, and not one solely focused on seven year old facts nor the law. because if. if, on tuesday the unsealing reveals what s anticipated. it will be the charging equivalent of the old game of twister. legal gymnastics seeking to elevate a misdemeanor case for falsifying business records, where the statute of limitations has arguably run. into a felony by combining it with an election law charge that even the new york times and washington post have regarded as risky or novel or untested. in fact, speaking of the washington post there, an outlier in the perceived liberal media in their response to the