evening, there s breaking news and a big victory for the biden administration, the fda and the maker but widely used abortion medication that s been taken by millions of women from more than two decades. mifepristone about an hour ago, we learned that a majority of justices on the supreme court decided in effect that the pill will remain legal no restrictions on its usage while an appeal of a lower lower court ruling moves forward that ruling by a federal judge in texas, known as an opponent of abortion, put a hold on the federal approval of the pill by the fda in 2000. and raised questions about the scientific evidence provided by the fda supporting its safety. the fifth circuit court of appeals, then froze parts of that texas judge s ruling but still left significant restrictions on this distribution prohibited pills sent by mail narrowed the window of its availability and blocked healthcare providers who are not doctors from prescribing the pills. this new ruling by the su
questions about the scientific evidence provided by the fda supporting its safety. the fifth circuit court of appeals, then froze parts of that texas judge s ruling but still left significant restrictions on this distribution. it prohibited pills sent by mail narrowed the window of its availability and blocked healthcare providers who are not doctors from prescribing the pills. this new ruling by the supreme court, requested by the vitamin ist rations removes all restrictions while the continues. cnn justice correspondent jessica schneider joins us now with more so the justices had until midnight. the ruling didn t come down until well into the evening. do we know why well, we ve been waiting for this a week. anderson after that initial kind of extension on wednesday as well, and it s likely that justice alito, who is the one who wrote he needed time to maybe write this four page dissent, and it s possible even that during their conference this morning, maybe the justices wer
instant horror of where is she what had happened to baby savanna? the answer would come decades later and astonish the world. it happened so fast, couldn t fathom what was going on imagine, your mother fugitive. your father stranger. your home, your name your past was any of it real? the first thing i felt, jus a pit in my stomach. i jus felt like it was my fault. a mother s crime. a father pain what kinds of emotions di it stir up when you would se that crib? it would just make me cry a daughter forced to face the shattering truth i was shocked and i was jus terrified. hello and welcome t dateline a father left childless and daughter left questioning he very identity. it was a case that started as custody battle, but turned int an international mystery tha spanned two decades and took investigators nearly 10,00 miles around the world all driven by a determined dad searching for answers and hi daughter here s andrea canning with finding savanna. in
his defense, mostly in the court of public opinion, becoming much more litigious, much more forward leaning, but now they have a whole new problem as there is a whistleblower coming to the hill wanting to share his story about how this investigation was handled. i r s agent has reportedly reached out to congress claiming to have information regarding the hunter biden investigation is seeking whistleblower protection. do we know more about that? yeah, it s interesting. this individual claims to be an i r s agent who worked on this case and says that he has information about how this has been a mishandled, claiming that there has been political interference and that this individual also says that they have evidence that would contradict public testimony by the attorney general, vowing that there would be no political interference in this probe. but anderson, i just want to emphasize that this individual has not been granted whistleblower protections. at this point, they have not presente
women s health, but let s be clear the american people must continue to use their vote as their voice in elected congress will pass a law. restoring the protections of roe v. wade, so he s running on this, and i think democrats are going to do that all over the country. chris insulted sanderson. how do you think republicans are viewing this? i mean, do you think at least some of the moderate republicans are breathing a sigh of relief tonight? well, this is kicked the can down the road and as your legal correspondence in the first block talked about this is something that may not be ultimately resolved until next summer, right on the eve of these presidential nominating conventions, so we ve got a long way to go for this to be resolved. i think right now, what republicans have been grappling with is the fact that you did have at least in a number of cases, an argument for pro life advocates to make pre overturning of roe versus wade around sort of moderate restrictions, things. is like