heidi, it seems to me this bill is going nowhere. harry reid is in a minority position, he says he s going to kill it, forget it. it s not going to ham. so all this talk is just political apology turg. it s not political policy turg even if this el kill it. the senate has the own bipartisan bill. like this. snow, this is a knee-jerk reaction to focus on the people and the risk that isn t there. it s not the proven risk. the proven risk is the visa waiver program. people wearing european passports depiatt they ve been back to syria back and forth. so your argument, because you re being an arrer with me, you re arguing that somehow some good has come from the republican things they passed. i wouldn t go that far. i thought you did, suggesting that somehow ig nice the high
and we must protect our people. the country is uneasy and unsettled. it sounds like luke skywalker. that was the speaker of the house, paul ryan, voicing his concerns over syrian refugees coming into the country after the paris attacks. the house, by the way approved legislation that would toughen the scrutiny of refugees wanting to interthe united states. let s bring in the hardball round table. heidi, it seems to me this bill is going nowhere. harry reid is in a minority position, he says he s going to kill it, forget it. it s not going to ham. so all this talk is just political apology turg. it s not political policy turg even if this el kill it. the senate has the own bipartisan bill.
when we prepared nobody stopped, we re still going. another group after us, ready to take care of the wounded officer. you could afford to pause. no. they re coming in, dug eyes? were you able to see the hostages? yes. a lot of, maybe 20 between the shooter and us. on the floor? on the floor, some of them one of them on the floor. so we were not we cannot show at the time, because it was too risky. but we keep going, keep going. at one moment there is a terrorist, we didn t now about it, the shield fell down, so the first two guys were without any protection. they still go. great reporting there. anyway, this captain s team
robert, give us a sense of the quantity, the quality and the tone of the difference between these two front-runners and how they would get the people we now see as the bad guys? essentially with hillary clinton versus donald trump, the difference between the two parties. on the one handled at least a party nominal of adults, a sophisticated multilevel plan, essentially a neoconplan. we could argue about that in terms of how many troops of ours, if we re talking special forces, but to contrast, you ve got donald trump, who really doesn t know anything about this and is relying on bluster. i ll bomb the out of them is not a strategy, it s an attitude. it s a gut feeling. it s understandable, and i m sure it will appeal to some people, but hillary clinton is at least dealing with her mind. she s got a plan that comes from the intellect, not just the gut. that s the basic distinction. i think hillary clinton is
capacity, including offices around the world, the nypd that gather intelligence. we just added 500 anti-terror officers, or critical response command, to help prevent terrorism, but also in the event we have a lone wolf that was undetectible so we can respond with a well-trained source. we re in a high state of readiness and we have a great track record of prevention. years ago, john lindsey, the mayor of new york said there s no republican way to collect garbage. hess argument was some things just have to be done. you are a pretty well-known progressive. is there a nuance of difference in the way you would go after the situation or rudy giuliani would go after it, or is there a difference in police work? i think a muscular capacity is and may more bloomberg put together we ve had to add to