Papua New Guinea’s Prime Minister James Marape accused Joe Biden of disparaging the South Pacific island nation by implying an uncle of the US President had.
for him to avoid the debate, although i have to say i would love to see the gop fireworks as i think we all would, but i think that no matter how good he is, he s one of six voices on the stage, and you know, he s a great counterpuncher which makes it be a great spectacle to watch but ultimately he s tens of points ahead of his nearest rival and he has no need to do this. he is the ex-president and they are simply sprinting behind him trying to catch up. howie: it is true, robbie, that he has no need to do this , certainly don t see president biden debating but you seem to feel like in the end, or you seem to be suggesting, implying, he s not going to be able to resist the lure of the cameras. he s a tv personality. howie: i forgot that. that s what brought him to the attention of so many americans in the first place. that s why so many people initially said this should be the guy to fix america s problems. he s particularly good at using the medium of tv and he s talent
is the right wing editorial page, publishing the strange editorial, implying, chief justice john roberts was getting cold feet about the decision, or was trying to attract, maybe, one of the other members over in a half decision, of some kind. it s also entirely possible that the draft was leak for different system with this, and that we may never fully understand. it is investigating the course of the leak. in the intervening months, we have also learned something interesting. back in november, the new york times published a letter from an anti activist. the man has since recanted his previous views. he claims, justice samuel alito, himself, linking the 2014 decision, limiting access to with controllable resigns. the court seems to have given up on trying to see the bottom of the dobbs leak. frankly, in a report released
that the decision was leaked by a liberal, working at the court who, is furious about it. wanting to raise awareness about a pending decision, or just blow the whistle, no matter how and effectually. it is equally plausible on what likely motives will be with that. they would be to box in the justices who join that opinion, going all the way to overturn roe. if they were worried that they might be getting cold feet, or might be looking for way to be not quite as radical. in fact, just days before the draft, the wall street journal is the right wing editorial page, publishing the strange editorial, implying, chief justice john roberts was getting cold feet about the decision, or was trying to attract, maybe, one of the other members over in a half decision, of some kind. it s also entirely possible that the draft was leak for different system with this, and that we may never fully understand. it is investigating the course of the leak. in the intervening months, we have also learned som
accounts. that would allow americans to actually wait until age 75 instead of 72 to start taking out money. now, what is the white house saying about the bill? i m assuming that the president is standing by before midnight to sign it? we actually heard from the president just about an hour ago. he released a written statement, and i ll read you a little bit of what he said. he said the bill is further proof that republicans and democrats can come together to deliver for the american people, who continue to say, i am looking forward to continued bipartisan progress in the year ahead. the white house is really touting this as a big bipartisan way, and they say capping off what has been a productive two years in washington, under the president s leadership. and it is sort of implying, look, congress is about to change when we come back in january. republicans are going to control the house. and they re trying to point back to the accomplishments that president biden and democrats have h