of the constitution. i m not familiar with having said that, senator. i m happy to respond later if i can find out where that quotation might ve come from. i am not familiar with having said that. well, you stated it in 2004. limited your chance to explain now. if the right of privacy is not specifically dial-in needed were described in the text of the constitution, is it still equally valid as a rule of law? yes, sir, i believe the easy answer to that question is that i would ace every decision on rights of privacy, fundamental rights, and use a constitutional interpretation model that is based on precedents of the 11th circuit. so you would now allow not allow your view of the constitution would interfere with any way with the right to private individuals that would come before you? absolutely not, senator. let me ask you about another part of your record. he supported legislation that would require doctors to report the number of abortions they perform. woul
«Маленькая женщина с большим IQ»: как Джанет Йеллен разрушает стереотипы forbes.ru - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from forbes.ru Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.