Live Breaking News & Updates on Eco Information|Page 4
Stay updated with breaking news from Eco information. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Information comes out. they have to accepmevet some of the guidance early on , even if it was well intended, was ill advised and to think thatand th they were squashing peopleey who went out and did their own research, found their own answers and just put it out there and say that you didn t have you don t have the right to do that i rign a countrhty, e the first amendment. but they re not going to try tat tr hide it because they don t care becausy e they think they ree rs righteous in doing this. doing they believe in their power this anmore than our rights. r you know, the theknow the disinformation board that they floated and then they saw that america wasn t goin board s accept it is really in effect, although they don t have it out there openly with what s her name singing mary poppins. oppi. but they basically have a disinformation board. dothey bas have di you think that s t constitutional, jessica?t i m not surhise the courts , i guess, will play it out if it- ever gets tak ....
Are getting into the act. surgeons week, biden s general who is fairly creepy,y, just called forreep a social mea crackdown on any dissent from the cdcc. ec we ve got to recognize that our technology platforms, particularly social media, these have an important role to play these these platforms have so much stepped up to doo the right thing and do nothing ,i should say to reduce the spread of misinformation. the spreadform of covered the spread of misinformation. who determines what is misinformation? this isn t about public health.t this ish. about erasing any o information on any narrative off the left that might disruptup their supposed truthpo. e but perhaps the most alarming of these efforts comes from biden s nominee to head the fcc, gigi sohn and a tweet last year she called this network, quote, state sponsored propaganda and then she defended her smear in language before congress. g i ve got a list of comments ....
It will be pretty difficult to overplay the significance of the week ahead. the democratic held house expected to impeach president trump potentially without any republican support but there s a fundamental question facing republicans. here s jake tapper. there has been a glut of o information for americans to consume over the past few months and not all of it is bad for president trump. there s hunter biden s swampy burisma contract, potential serious fbi misconduct, but make no mistake. the primary question facing the house of representatives and the nation this week is whether t acceptable for a u.s. president to use the power of his office to get a foreign government to launch an investigation. ....
A certain degree of a skepticism of intelligence is a requirement of the president. the question is whether he s disregarding it altogether. he said to margaret brenner, they may be right about that but i m going to try anyway. it s a different thing if he rejects their assessment of facts without a contrary fset o information to base it on. let me go to kelly. do presidents act like this? i thought the most important time of the day for the president, when they get their daily intelligence, when they find out what they should worry about, where their focus of worry should be in the world, so they can focus our intelligence, our diplomacy being ptic power ....
That the department of justice does not give over information relevant to ongoing investigations to congress. that s something the house intelligence committee through the use of the purported ovsight role has done away with tucker: when you say purported oversight role, do they not have an ovee? they have an oversight role. tucker: what do you mean purported? they are using the guise of the oversight role to ask for o information either that they should not get or that they are potentially and by many accounts coordinating with the white house and others who are the subject of the investigation, that s an entirely different problem. tucker: i understand you re a partisanke involved in a paan debate but take three steps back. there is a public t interest hee soth we know that the last administration had a paid informant spying on at least three members of the trump campaign. ....