November 19, 2014, city of San Francisco Historic Preservation committee please stand by. San francisco Architectural Heritage was present and expressed heritage report on three contracts and planning staff gave a short presentation. Committee member supervisor avalos did have some comments about San Franciscos program in relationship to other programs throughout the state of california and the types of properties that took advantage of the program as compared to cities and San Francisco and did comment as to whether or not the properties applying for the mills act this year were in truly need of a property tax break. As a result of those comments, the committee deciding to forward the contracts to the full board without recommendation which was disappointing for us but we believe well be able to demonstrate to the full board that the Mills Act Program is in fact a really important viable financial incentive for Landmark Properties in San Francisco. Sew so well keep you posted on that.
San francisco Architectural Heritage was present and expressed heritage report on three contracts and planning staff gave a short presentation. Committee member supervisor avalos did have some comments about San Franciscos program in relationship to other programs throughout the state of california and the types of properties that took advantage of the program as compared to cities and San Francisco and did comment as to whether or not the properties applying for the mills act this year were in truly need of a property tax break. As a result of those comments, the committee deciding to forward the contracts to the full board without recommendation which was disappointing for us but we believe well be able to demonstrate to the full board that the Mills Act Program is in fact a really important viable financial incentive for Landmark Properties in San Francisco. Sew so well keep you posted on that. The second item i wanted to share with you was an item heard at the Planning Commission.
November 19, 2014, city of San Francisco Historic Preservation committee please stand by. San francisco Architectural Heritage was present and expressed heritage report on three contracts and planning staff gave a short presentation. Committee member supervisor avalos did have some comments about San Franciscos program in relationship to other programs throughout the state of california and the types of properties that took advantage of the program as compared to cities and San Francisco and did comment as to whether or not the properties applying for the mills act this year were in truly need of a property tax break. As a result of those comments, the committee deciding to forward the contracts to the full board without recommendation which was disappointing for us but we believe well be able to demonstrate to the full board that the Mills Act Program is in fact a really important viable financial incentive for Landmark Properties in San Francisco. Sew so well keep you posted on that.
Assembly of the current board president. And, madam clerk, could you please describe the rules of this election . There are no absent abstention or passes. All supervisors must vote when a question is posed. The lowest vote getter is not obligated to withdraw their name and they will be included on subsequent ballots unless the nominee chooses to withdraw their own name. At any time a nominee may withdraw their own name, the board can adopt a motion to reopen nomination with a majority vote as the president stated. In the event that no nominee receives a majority vote there shall be an additional roll call until a nominee receives a majority vote. And then the supervisors who have been nominated for the election to the office of board president is supervisor tang. So, when your name is called, please indicate your preference from among the nominees stated. In this case there is only one. Again, if no supervisors received a majority of the votes well proceed to the next round until a no
San francisco Architectural Heritage was present and expressed heritage report on three contracts and planning staff gave a short presentation. Committee member supervisor avalos did have some comments about San Franciscos program in relationship to other programs throughout the state of california and the types of properties that took advantage of the program as compared to cities and San Francisco and did comment as to whether or not the properties applying for the mills act this year were in truly need of a property tax break. As a result of those comments, the committee deciding to forward the contracts to the full board without recommendation which was disappointing for us but we believe well be able to demonstrate to the full board that the Mills Act Program is in fact a really important viable financial incentive for Landmark Properties in San Francisco. Sew so well keep you posted on that. The second item i wanted to share with you was an item heard at the Planning Commission.