trump campaign, and the russian government. and whether there was any coordination between the campaign and russia s efforts. it would later be revealed that trump had demanded loyalty from comey, and repeatedly pressed him to end the investigation into trump s first national security adviser, michael flynn. after he refused to do so, trump fired comey in shocking fashion. in a remarkable oval office meeting the following day, the day after he fired him. trump told russian diplomats that by firing comey, the previous day, quote, i faced a great pressure, because of russia. that is taken off. around the same time, he all but admitted to lester holt that he had fired comey because of the, quote, made-up russia investigation. with comey gone, andy mccabe became the acting fbi writer director. in one of his first actions, the very next day, was to open up a counter intelligence investigation into the president, in his ties to russia out of fears that he too would be fired. and
we have an entirely different show planned for tonight, but the business the former fbi director, james comey and his former deputy, andrew mccabe. both of whom president trump saw as enemies. both of them faced rare, supposedly random, but highly intensive irs audits. you may remember back when then fbi director james comey oversaw the early stages of the investigation into ties between the trump campaign and russia. in the summer of 2016. with questions swirling about those ties, as trump took office, comey dropped a public bombshell in the early days of the trump presidency. i ve been authorized by the department of justice to confirm that the fbi, as part of our counter intelligence mission, is investigating the russian government s efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election. that includes investigating the nature of any links between individuals associated with the trump campaign, and the russian government. and whether there was any coordination between
The proposed design apparently stops its building 3. 5 away from three of our Property Line windows in the kitchens of our front units. The new plan though, if i understand it correctly, is that it does not match our light well midbuilding. The new building runs right up to an alongside our building by about half of our light well. This will further compromise necessary light into our bathroom and kitchen windows in our three front units. The plan also completely eliminates one of our Property Line windows in the dining room of our front unit. We need a detailed drawing of exactly how this building will impact our Property Line windows and need to reach an amicably place with this developer. We have asked him to participate in a preop meaning with the city or at least fund that so we can get clarity from the city, namely dbi and fire about what will happen with our remaining Property Line windows that are left. We would appreciate cooperation in that regard. We would like to continue t
We will be calendaring a public discussion of that item i believe on the 10th of january. But it was a productive meeting yesterday. Thank you for that update. Any additional comments, questions . Commissioners, under the director arizona report, item 6, directors announcements. Commissioners in the interest of time i think i will pass. I dont have anything urgent to report, but other than to wish you happy holidays. Item 7, review of the past events of the past week. Good afternoon, commissioners this. Week at Land Use Commission there were a couple of designations and both nominations were reviewed by the Historic Preservation commission earlier this year and this week at Committee Members of the public spoke in support of each. There was no opposition. And they were both recommended for approval to the full board. There is also a hearing on the western edition, after the redevelopment agency. This was at the request of supervisor olague. The Planning Department was the only city age
Meet last night and one item of note was a rehearing request for Building Permit application dealing with glenn canyon park and before the hearing the request was withdrawn and the decision became final and the Building Permit is approved. Just wanted to inform the commission on that and there are no other reports. Commissioners, under item 814601 larkin street, informational, current status of the project design. Good afternoon president fong and members of commission. I am going to keep my comments very brief here. The subject property was considered in june of 2010 and june of this year for proposal to demolish the church. This commission cited concerns no. 1 about the demolition of the existing church which is considered an Historic Resource under ceqa, but also to do with what i would collective call the compatibility. The project sponsor has been working collaboratively with Planning Department staff and with representatives of the community in an attempt to address staff concern