we make a distinction between voter suppression and suspension. the ability of a state legislative body to come along and vote, their legislature vote to change who is declared the winner i find to be somewhat astounding. but the supreme court ruled did not rule that way today. president biden in just the last hour reacting to a major decision handing handed down today by the supreme court, which is calling into question the future of the voting rights act and could embolden those republicans pushing voter suppression measures all across the country. the conservative majority on the supreme court up holding two voting restrictions in the state of arizona, one that requires officials to toss out ballots cast in the wrong precinct and another that makes it a crime for most people to collect ballots for delivery to polling
health care. we re going be open tomorrow, be open saturday, and patients are going to get their health care. we also have tremendous support from our local police departments. so i was in touch with them today, and we know we will have increased law enforcement presence at our health centers, but that s not really a long-term solution. you don t want to solve this problem by having police there constantly when women are coming in for health care. what we re doing is reviewing the laws that are already on the books that we might be able to use, as well as what new laws we might be able to craft. we have great support from our governor deval patrick and attorney general martha coakley as well as our legislative leadership. so everyone today said, all right, let s read the decision and let s find out what the answer is and what law might be constitutional and let s get that law through the legislature. marty walz, president of the planned parenthood league of massachusetts, and author
patients came in and got their health care. we re going be open tomorrow, be open saturday, and patients are going to get their health care. we also have tremendous support from our local police departments. so i was in touch with them today, and we know we will have increased law enforcement presence at our health centers, but that s not really a long-term solution. you don t want to solve this problem by having police there constantly when women are coming in for health care. what we re doing is reviewing the laws that are already on the books that we might be able to use, as well as what new laws we might be able to craft. we have great support from our governor deval patrick and attorney general martha coakley as well as our legislative leadership. so everyone today said, all right, let s read the decision and let s find out what the answer is and what law might be constitutional and let s get that law through the legislature. marty walz, president of the planned parenthood leagu
we also have tremendous support from our local police departments. so i was in touch with them today, and we know we will have increased law enforcement presence at our health centers, but that s not really a long-term solution. you don t want to solve this problem by having police there constantly when women are coming in for health care. what we re doing is reviewing the laws that are already on the books that we might be able to use, as well as what new laws we might be able to craft. we have great support from our governor deval patrick and attorney general martha coakley as well as our legislative leadership. so everyone today said, all right, let s read the decision and let s find out what the answer is and what law might be constitutional and let s get that law through the legislature. marty walz, president of the planned parenthood league of massachusetts, and author of that law that was striked down today by the supreme court, the 2007 law. my pleasure. thank you. a lo