watered down resolution? mainly it is too little too watered down resolution? mainly it is too little too late, watered down resolution? mainly it is too little too late, but watered down resolution? mainly it is too little too late, but a - is too little too late, but a ceasefire is the most urgent thing that needs to happen, so i hope it does pass. i think the call to take out the urgent suspension of hostilities by the us primarily is a shameful act and also deeply worrying for what might yet come. [30 worrying for what might yet come. do you think other countries will vote for it, there are has been anger from some arab states that it has been watered down and they have to swallow it for the sake of a deal or say it is too thin to bother with. i can t speak on the way they might vote, but we may see push back from russia and others. historically and other the last few weeks we have seen every vote that passes through the security council and the un assembly has supp
they confirmed that lenka hlavkova the head of the university s institute of musicology was one of those shot dead. outside the university, people have been leaving flowers and candles. saturday has been declared a day of national mourning across the czech republic. in a friday morning news conference, police showed bodycam video from their officers. it shows them entering the building to find the gunman. there had been some criticism of their response, but the police said the time between receiving the first emergency call and officers stepping into the building was four minutes. police said the gunman took his own life following the attack. he s been named by local media as 24 year old student david kozak. let s get more from that news conference where prague s chief police officer gave his reaction to thursday s shooting. translation: i was there on site. i was severely impacted by and shattered to see it. and i ve been with the police force for a0 years. around 220, 2
As Columbia University experiences growing tensions, its faculty senate is approaching a resolution carefully. This decision could profoundly affect the
Evil. she had a chance, a historic chance. the speaker of the house, to condemn anti-semitism. first she should have condemned omar, representative omar. but then she still should have condemned anti-semitism per se but she didn t do it. either she s not capable, or it s because she has caucuses. it was the black caucus. the progressive caucus. laura: jeffries those guys. all of these people, and the latinos, the cortez and her quartet and the islamic community and care and basically condemning what the problem was, ended up being a watered down resolution. basically many of those people felt if you criticized omar, even though it was legitimate, if you criticize her, you re anti-muslim and that s why they put islamic phobia tonight with
And it s sad, and it s something that should be called by name. it shouldn t be put in a watered down resolution. it should be done the way the republicans did it when steve king made terrible comments. we called it out by name. we stripped him of his committee memberships, and we d like to see democrats follow suit. wait. what? steve king? she s actually using steve king as an example. steve king, who in an interview with the new york times asked when white supremacists and white nationalists became offensive, who has been making outrageous racist statements for years. racism so bad that republicans finally could no longer turn a blind eye to it. his party couldn t turn a blind eye, but it seems the president could. i don t i haven t been following it. i really haven t been following it. he didn t have anything to say about steve king there, but he sure did when he said this back in 2014.