classroom. when you are honest about it the people support the bill because we re not saying you should never have these conversations in a classroom. we re talking about the age appropriate nature of it. harris: i want to get to this. last week judge ketanji brown jackson when she was on the hill refused to answer the definition of the word woman. she was asked about that by senator marsha blackburn of tennessee. after that fox news reached out to several biden administration agencies with the same question and they were unable to provide their definition for a person to be categorized as a woman despite boasting earlier entire initiatives aimed at helping women. so the miriam webster definition has it this way. woman, adult female person. pretty simple and it gets us into the conversation that you would hope that a future justice on the u.s. supreme court would be able to get into at this period in america s
for judge jackson. a number of republicans didn t like what it was intimating that they were racist or had other motives other than she doesn t line up with our judicial philosophy based on her ideology for the court that we would nominate. there was some tension in the vote yesterday and not surprising that would happen along a party line when the vote finally did happen. harris: they weren t imagining that if that s what they were feeling in that room that maybe there was a finger toward racism. watch this. this is the most ridiculous. just say i don t trust a black woman to do the job. because i know that y all didn t have these same issues with amy coney barrett. you didn t ask those questions and you don t have those problems. i know what this is. we all know what it is. we know what it is. we recognize it. we re used to this. harris: what about clarence
president biden is coming from, right? he s got no vision. geraldo: remember crimea fell to pollutant during the obama administration. and the democrats have been very squishy. katie is right, about nato particularly, as a war correspondent overall these decades something that always irked me was how little the presence was of our european allies, 2% of their gross national product should be spent on their own defense and yet we are paying for the bases in germany, we are paying for the bases everywhere and i don t trust a democrat regime, i like seeing trump and together, they seemed, maybe it s just optics, they seemed equal to me. trump, the boisterous bullying braggart and so is putin and i think they were evenly matched. greg: jesse, pollutant has to be disappointed because he can t blackmail president biden because everything is out there with hunter now, he can t find
matters of foreign policy. my quibble is just about timing. i think there may be a time and place to weigh in, about you if our negotiators are telling you if we pass a bill now, we are less likely to see a final agreement that we can vote up or down on, i don t know why we would move forward given that admonition. there may be a time and a place for congress to weigh in on the nuclear agreement, but if our negotiators are telling us we re undermining them by doing it now, i don t see the real reason to rush. wouldant a vote by the congress reinforce the letter sent by tom cotton and other senators to the ayatollah that said don t trust a deal made by the president, because it will be written in disappearing ink and could be taken back? if you have a vote, it seems that you re saying, yeah, it s not his to say. you can look at it as an effort to undermine negotiation, but look at it as fairly innocuous. in that it essentially says that congress has the right and able
now, i don t see the real reason to rush. wouldant a vote by the congress reinforce the letter sent by tom cotton and other senators to the ayatollah that said don t trust a deal made by the president, because it will be written in disappearing ink and could be taken back? if you have a vote, it seems that you re saying yeah it s not his to say. you can look at it as an effort to undermine negotiation, but look at it as fairly innocuous. in that it essentially says that congress has the right and able to vote on a deal once it s inked. you don t have to pass a bill now to tell congress it has the way to weigh in on a negotiated deal once it s done. there s an argument to be said that passing the corker bill today isn t that big a deal because congress still has the ability to way in and frankly i hope we have the maturity to wait, given the fact that we still have the ability to take a vote if and when we ever get to