performance. maybe he was tired. he was not sharp today. neil: i think a lot of democrats expected him to deliver the goods and to raise the concerns about remind congress it s up to you now to follow up on some of the clear crumbs that i dropped for you to pursue. did that work? i was very convinced when the report came out regarding the obstruction noncall. i m convinced after his testimony that he did mean to put this matter in the hands of congress. whether he i don t he s putting his finger on the scale. i believe he punted to congress or punted to the american people in terms of the next election. one thing is certain, this matter is out of the hands of the judicial system. it s now in the hands of congress or the american people. you know him very well.
to fire mr. comey led one white house lawyer to take the extraordinary step of misleading mr. trump about whether he had the authority to remove comey. it does seem almost everyone around the president or a lot of people around the president for sure were worried he was putting himself in legal jeopardy. right. i mean, it s a fascinating thing that you have somebody who s a lawyer, a white house lawyer, who gives advice, says, you actually, you need cause to fire the fbi director. then when they realize, actually, no. you don t he s in a reason to fire the fbi director, holds back on sharing that information with the president as a with to shield the president from making a decision that has the potential to be politically calamitous. that s significant. as a lawyer, as a client, you expect that your lawyer s going to give you the fullest, most complete and accurate information possible, but in this case i think there was an