Stay updated with breaking news from Dont debase. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Particularly in free speech. we don t see that clarity or purpose or thought that we saw with scalia. and this business about, you know, someone who can reach over the aisle and get compromised, that s really silly. really? scalia scalia and kennedy even kennedy are not going to say, you know what, i like elena. don t debase my thought, professor. i m talking about intellectual charisma. you brought warren on the court and you joined one frankfurter and you saw inherently in the constitution that separate but equal wasn t equal. that kind of thinking. the pursuit of happiness and the same-sex marriage should be on the table. i m sorry, that s my argument. well, you know, warren was able to convince his colleagues the importance of all of the voting heavily in this regard. we re heavy. jonathan, please come back. we re out of time. ....
Can elena kagan arouse that kind of interest hanging around the court? will she be able to lead the minds over there? i don t see that in her writings. civil libertarians are uncomfortable with her writings in free speech. i don t see that type of clarity of purpose or thought we saw with scalia. this business about, you know, someone who can reach over the aisle and get compromise, i mean, that s really silly. i mean really? scalia and kennedy are not going to say, you know what, i really like elena so i m going to separate the church and state a little more. don t debase my thought, professor. i m talking about intellectual charisma. for example, when you brought earl warren on the court and joined up with frankfurter and saw inherently in the constitution that separate but equal wasn t equal. that kind of thinking. or to see the idea of pursuit of happiness and the basic founding documents said same-sex marriage should be on the table. i m sorry. ....
Of purpose or thought that we saw with scalia. and this business about, you know, someone who can reach over the aisle and get compromise, i mean, that s really silly. i mean. really? scalia and kennedy, even kennedy are not going to say, you no he what? i really like elena so i m going to separate the church and state a little more. don t debase my thought, professor. i m talking about intellectual charisma. for example, when you brought warren on the court and you saw inherently in the constitution that separate but equal wasn t equal, that kind of thinking. well, you know or to say the idea of per sued of happiness and the basic founding documents said same-sex marriage should be on the table. i m sorry, that s my argument. warren was able to convince his colleagues the importance of all of them voting heavily in this hard. we re out of time. it s great to have you on. all right. ....