Stay updated with breaking news from Don verrilli. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
the federalism values are promoted by our interpretation because if that is, indeed, what a state thought, if a state really would have preferred that not to have the state government participate in the implementation of this act, for reasons that your honor identified, the structure of the act that congress put in place and that we re advocating for today fully vindicates that concern. they can decide not to participate without having any adverse consequences visited upon the citizens of the state. and that s why our reading is the pro-federalism reading. it s their reading that seems to me that is the anti-federalism reading, and that s a powerful reason to reject it. and if i could go to the second statutory point, which is related to what we re talking about, justice kennedy, which is section 1321, says that this statute is designed to afford state flexibility. state flexibility. it would be an orwellian sense of the word flexibility to use it in the manner that ....
is that the u.s. supreme court where justices question the affordable care law contraceptive coverage. the g7ilcote is where meeting, minus russia concludes. yang yang has details of that meeting. president obama calls an ofrgency sideline meeting the g7, ousting russia from the ranks of the exclusive group of eight. the crimean situation overshadowed the situation. at the conclusion of the summit, obama took to the world toge and said putin needs understand there is a choice to be made here. it is now up to russia to act responsibly and show itself once again willing to abide by international rules and international norms. if it chooses to do so, i think there could be a better outcome. if it fails to do so, there will be additional costs, and those will have disruptive effect to the global economy, but they will have the greatest impact on russia. costs willditional come in the form of more sanctions. it will be limited to officials circle and alone russian bank. ....
c-span2. and live today at 4 p.m. eastern here on c-span2, chilean president michelle [inaudible] will be at the brookings institution. she s meeting with president obama this morning. you had broadcast tv and then cable came along, and then satellite. what if satellite had said, you know, we re different than cable. we have a slightly different technology, so we re going to take that and not consider ourselves to be what is in law called an nvpd. so we don t have to negotiate. but satellite didn t do that, and so why should aereo be able to come up with a different technology and say we don t have to negotiate for copyrighted material? we ve said from the beginning this isn t about being a opposed to technology. there s still a technology there in aereo, and maybe there s a business model for it. but that doesn t mean you can evade the law to run a business. more about the supreme court decision against aereo with the head of the national association of broadcast ....
dad, thank you for always being there with us. please stay at our sides forever. and to all of japanese people and my little brother in japan [ speaking japanese ] never, never, never forget. this is my prayer. [ applause a and our cousin, paul, who would have been a grandfather for the first time this year. paul would have done a great job with his granddaughter, danielle jean, and my uncle, too, john monihan, who our family hasn t been the same the past 13 years, but we carry on with his spirit. thank you to all the first responder who is sacrificed so much that day and continue to protect us and the u.s. troops who protect our freedoms at home and overseas. god bless america. [ applause ] tyler victor ugolyn michael a. uliano jonathan j. uman anil shivhari umarkar allen v. upton diane marie urban john damien vaccacio bradley hodges vadas william valcarcel felix antonio vale ivan vale benito valentin santos valentin jr. carlton francis valvo ii pendyala vamsikrish ....
usually straddles the middle and whose vote takes the middle. he wrote a concurring opinion saying, let s lower the temperature here. the decision doesn t mean as much as my colleague ruth ginsberg with the dissent has said but it s, you know, it s narrower the way justice alito says and like he tried to bridge the rhetoric in the moment more than the substantive issue. justice ginsberg is not normally an alarmist and having achieving the goals that bob said might have been part of the reason for the dissent. she saw it the way she saw it and that kind of alarmist dissent, there s history for it. you remember that justice scalia in two big gay rights decisions said, if you buy this, then the next thing you know, same-sex marriage and he turned out to be right. somewhat broader question still focusing on hobby lobby, the case involved four separate issues, any one of which could have been determinetive. whether a corporation was a person for the religious freedom res ....