Stay updated with breaking news from Doma ya. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
In the ridiculous position of trying to pretend his tweets are something other than doma going attempts to rally his base by making it seem that zillions of people are pouring across the boards and the democrats are in favor of crime and open borders. conservatives are big fan of the constitution and they like to talk about the constitution a lot and so putting yourself on a side of the issue that is opposed to constitution and the right to due process you would think is not a very good al qaeda for a republican president, but back in the early days of the tea party doing a survey to understand folks considered part of the tea party and what motivated them and there was a question, do you agree or disagree that people who worked hard and play by the rules can t get a fair shake and doing the right thing and following the rules, that you ve still been getting screwed over in america and a lot of trump suptsers feel that way. they ve worked hard and played by the rules and doing thin ....
In the doma case there was a constitutional question where the country was moving in a direction that was inconsistent with the statute. there was a huge constitutional values question that was being presented here. here, and nick just said the catch phrase. the department has a duty to defend as long as there s a non-frivolous argument. here the arguments are thin. their duty is clear to enforce the law, defend the law. doma was a very different type of case. you know, maya, it strikes me one of the things that s happening is there s all this focus of tension on rosenstein and the white house and him pressuring session pz. you ve got sessions over doj. but sessionsize really going to work at the doj even if he has so far maintained the integrity of the mueller investigation as far as he can. jeff sessions is on the home team. that s right. and the home team is really about a policy position, which ....
Found really fascinating. even if you fake doma as the closest analog, there was a big public debate about it. there was congressional notice. they defended it in the lower courts. and then they stopped at at pellate level. you were just noticing this happening like this didn t it almost seemed like they tried to sneak this past everyone, nick. this came out of nowhere. you know, the three line attorneys that withdrew their names from this case, they re civil servants. these are people who have served across administrations. they have defended programs they disagree with. they ve made arguments they personally disagree with. but it just goes to show how outlandish this argument truly is. and the aggressiveness with which the trump administration is pressing it. i think there s a temptation on the from the critics and the people who invoke doma to normalize this, to say that this is something we ve seen before. but that s just not the case. this is new. it is different. go ahead ....
Public debate about it. there was congressional notice. they defended it in the lower courts. and then they stopped at at pellate level. you were just noticing this happening like this didn t it almost seemed like they tried to sneak this past everyone, nick. this came out of nowhere. you know, the three line attorneys that withdrew their names from this case, they re civil servants. these are people who have served across administrations. they have defended programs they disagree with. they ve made arguments they personally disagree with. but it just goes to show how outlandish this argument truly is. and the aggressiveness with which the trump administration is pressing it. i think there s a temptation on the from the critics and the people who invoke doma to normalize this, to say that this is something we ve seen before. but that s just not the case. this is new. it is different. go ahead. the other point i d like to make here is this is part of a pattern. so this is not ....
Direction that was inconsistent with the statute. there was a huge constitutional values question that was being presented here. here, and nick just said the catch phrase. the department has a duty to defend as long as there s a non-frivolous argument. here the arguments are thin. their duty is clear to enforce the law, defend the law. doma was a very different type of case. you know, maya, it strikes me one of the things that s happening is there s all this focus of tension on rosenstein and the white house and him pressuring session pz. you ve got sessions over doj. but sessionsize really going to work at the doj even if he has so far maintained the integrity of the mueller investigation as far as he can. jeff sessions is on the home team. that s right. and the home team is really about a policy position, which is a policy disagreement with the affordable care act. right. ....