search dog, a scent dog that is trying to find brian alive. so they have not discounted that brian is alive. a cadaver dog is one that goes for the scent of decomposition. in cases that i have covered throughout the years, this evidence routinely comes into a courtroom. it is the forensic dog evidence. and there s great explainers on all of the training these dogs get. it s highly important in investigations. so i find it very interesting. and maybe they re not focused on the carlton preserve anymore because there s just very few there, but they obviously want to search somewhere, and those dogs will be useful. all right, jean, thank you very much for explaining all of that. next, the nation s most-watched governor s race heats up. the democratic candidate doing everything he can to tie his opponent to trump. the republican is keeping his distance. you didn t mention his name tonight. i m a virginia-first candidate. i m on the ballot
on zumot s clothes, those clothes were sent to the bureau of alcohol, tobacco and firearms, and they showed no evidence of gasoline at all. the atf has a protocol and the atf also put out a protocol that said they put out a protocol that said you never take a dog alert, a single dog alert and draw a conclusion. and, in fact, if the atf says negative, you should not allow in the dog alert. so why would people believe the dog over the atf? i think once again you get into this idea that people have dogs, they kind of ascribe supernatural powers to dogs. i have two large dogs and one having been through a couple of cases with dog evidence, as much as i love my dogs, i m certainly not going to want to convict somebody and put their liberty at stake based on dog evidence. still, as he presented his case, geragos had a problem. and he knew it. what it came down to was the character assassination block of the case. the first two blocks of this
as i love my dogs, i m certainly not going to want to put their liberty at stake based on dog evidence. still, as he presented his case, geragos had a problem and he knew it. what it came down to was the character assassination block of the case. the first two blocks of this case revolved around the what so-called scientific evidence, and that was absolutely destroyed. and then you ended up with the character assassination block. the solution? paul zumot himself appears to have demanded it. the chance to defend himself to the jury by testifying. some courtroom observers believe the defense had already created a reasonable doubt that testifying was in fact, risky. especially for paul, said his friend. knowing paul the way i know paul and the way he could be interpreted incorrectly, i was very nervous about paul taking the stand.
have started the fire. how could he have been in two places at once? and as for rosie, the yellow lab who alerted to a gasoline smell on zumot s clothes, those clothes were sent to the bureau of alcohol, tobacco and firearms, and they showed no evidence of gasoline at all. the atf has a protocol and specifically one of the things the prosecution didn t tell this jury which we brought out is that the atf also put out a protocol that said you never take a dog alert, single dog alert, and draw a conclusion. in fact, if the atf says negative, then you should not allow in the dog alert. so why would people believe the dog over the atf? you get this idea of people have dogs. they kind of ascribe supernatural powers to dogs. i ve got two large dogs. having been through a couple of cases with dog evidence, as much
on zumot s clothes, those clothes were sent to the bureau of alcohol, tobacco and firearms, and they showed no evidence of gasoline at all. the atf h a protocol and the atf also put out a protocol that said they put out a protocol that said you never take a dog alert, a single dog alert and draw a conclusion. and, in fact, if the atf says negative, you should not allow in the dog alert. so why would people believe the dog over the atf? i think once again you get into this idea that people have dogs, they kind of ascribe supernatural powers to dogs. i have two large dogs and one having been through a couple of cases with dog evidence, as much as i love my dogs, i m certainly not going to want to convict somebody and put their liberty at stake based on dog evidence.