They engage in that debate in a way that doesn t acknowledge the resource and what it has shown is hard for them to engage in that debate effectively. todd: a pleasure having you on the program. i wish your levelheadedness was back on facebook, we won t have the opportunity to interview here on our great show. hopefully they will listen to you. have a great day. still had a final autopsy report shows gabby petito was strangled to death after four weeks before her body was found. doctor michael breaks down the details. todd: lawrence jones and sean duffy all live in the next hour of fox and friends first, do not go anywhere.
Trying to take that path. we will see if that path wins out. todd: a response from facebook, quote, we ve taken down 150 network seeking to mitigate public debate since 2016 and they have originated in over 50 countries with majority come outside the us, our track record shows we crackdown on that with the same intensity we apply in the us. final question to you. we have 45 seconds with the answer. how worried should facebook the that this is the straw that will break the camel s back when it comes to congress taking away section 230 immunity. it is on the table and one of the problems that has been endemic with most discussions about section 230 reform, they are not terribly well thought out and the balance they have to strike to be constitutional is a real challenge they have to continue to face and the question for the company is can
Focus on partisan voter turnout. jillian: in addition to the ban, stronger voter id laws and bowel harvesting. facebook under fire is another whistleblower sent to testify in europe. started losing sleep, national government and presidents felt the need. to manipulate their own citizenry. global public policy at facebook chris kelly joins us. why doesn t facebook just admitted is wrong and fix it? in some cases there are challenges. that s what a lot of people in the company of trying to do and
Hill. thank you, donie. joining us now is a current facebook executive, monica bik ert is a vice president for content policy at facebook. thank you so much for being here. i appreciate it. i know you just heard that report, and so i want to get your take on what frances haugen has said. is it true that facebook uses these algorithms that push inflammatory content because that drives more clicks and engagement? it is not true. and i want to say, i think there have been a lot of mischaracterizations today about what those documents say and about the work that we are doing to keep facebook safe. but just so i m clear, i just want to be clear, you do not use, you re saying what part is not true. you don t push out inflammatory controversial content because you know that heightens engagement? we do the opposite, in fact, and if you look in our transparency center, you can actually see that we demote,
But facebook hides behind walls that keeps researchers and regulators from understanding the true dynamics of their system. facebook will tell you privacy means they can t give you data. this is not true. do you keep some of the visibility from regulators? i want to first answer the point about researchers. we actually partner with hundreds of researchers. we put out thousands of peer-reviewed research articles that our researchers have participated in in the past several years, so this is something we care a lot about. with election 2020, we are working with 17 independent researchers who have access to data, and of course we have to make sure that s privacy protected but they have access to the relevant data so they can do work and independently put out their assessment of these issues on our platform. this is something we care deeply about. if there s no problem, if you re doing everything great, why are you asking for more