republican colleagues on my side that testified and asked these questions. that is something that the american public a search to know. congressman, through every administration that i can think of there have been questions brought up by some billions but they always said that they re not sure that they re just making the stuff of. and here we, our 2023, actually talking about this and seeing evidence of. it so it is a remarkable moment in our history. i do want to quickly ask you, i know you came here to talk about uaps but i do have to ask you because i m a journalist. and this is in the u.s. about hunter biden. the deal blown up by the judge, and prosecutors and the defense usually have their stuff together when it comes to putting these plea deals together. but the judge was not having it. where do you see all of this going? yes, i keep thinking it s another nail in the coffin. and they just keep knocking the nails. and it doesn t seem to affect. and, in my opinion, ma am the j
was a trump appointee who followed who oversaw this investigation into hunter biden, that he has disagreed with the reports of the whistleblower s to congress, and elsewhere. but what happened today was really a blowup of something that has been and it s a very unusual. including for the ambiguity about what had covered. right? these charges are about. taxes they are ancillary, about guns. they had nothing to do with foreign influence peddling. that is a separate topic. but, apparently, they re all conflated certainly from the republican perspective that s the question was, was there more to learn. and i think republicans do think there is more to learn. and he s clearly, still, apparently under investigation for the former. that s really the connective tissue yes between him and the president were you selling the name joe biden overseas? did you enrich your family? did you follow the registrations? that s a separate matter than the gun thing. that s the key poi
i support the policy, and in fact, i ve been asking the administration to do this for the last few years. if you re claiming credible fear, you re passing countries where your fear is gone, and that is why this transit country policy is something that i ve supported and i hope that it will probably go up to the supreme court, and i hope that the supreme court will look at this favorably. congressman, you have been a vocal opponent of the president asylum policy. how should the supreme court justices respond in your view? should they hear the case? yeah, i mean i think the court in this case that the thing, and i disagreed with what i consider a transit ban that the administration put into place, that also the trump administration had put into place. i disagree with my colleague from texas and friend, henry clay are. when you think about credible fear and where somebody will person for asylum, let s take
now, they are working this out, elliott? they are. they will take up to 30 days to brief the issue, right so memos to the judge, and the judge will come up with a decision and perhaps agreed to a plea agreement. but we will see. all right. i ve got to be honest with you. i m tired of talking about this, until we see something new. but we are going to talk and me both the grand jury is expected you know i m right. you are not wrong the grand jury in the trump case is expected to meet tomorrow. i will be, but what is the story is tomorrow, supposedly. but we were expecting them the grand jury to gather yesterday. and they did not. so, where are we now with all of this? if the grand jury meets, it doesn t necessarily mean there s going to be an indictment, correct? tomorrow? not necessarily. but in order for there to be an indictment, the grand jury has to a prosecution go into the grandeur, a present evidence and information, and within an hour, they c
that he had a couple of months ago we re told also was normal. so, that s a very good sign. if you add to, that, sarah that he was in the icu but then left out of the icu very quickly, it s another good sign. it basically means that he was stable and they didn t find any sort of permanent or long-standing consequence on his heart. his heart function was normal at the time that they let him out of the icu. so these are all good signs. they still have to figure out exactly what happened here. and that probably means putting in a longer, lasting ekg sort of monitor. something that is a holster monitor to look at his equipped trickle pattern of the heart, over a longer period of time, to see if there s at more maladies that isn t caught on the snapshot. but that s probably what s happening now. but the picture is increasingly looking better for him. not of the woods, still have to figure out what exactly happened here. but, the last couple of days, in terms of getting out of the icu quickl