let s watch. perhaps most troubling, it appears that the author s views on a potential lab leak changed abruptly after the february 1st conference call with doctors fauci and collins. they continued to disprove the lab leak theory and fully support the nature theory applying faulty assumptions and willfully ignoring circumstantial evidence that tended to support the lab leak hypothesis. harris: all the books fauci wrote, democrats are dismissing it as pure politics. a quick watch. we should let our expert communities continue to do their jobs while we as lawmakers focus on policies to help prevent the next pandemic and save future lives. but instead of doing that, we are here interrogating researchers who wrote a paper three years ago so my colleagues
republicans wants answers from doctors fauci and collins and fauci has not moved despite the in intel community pointing to the lab leak theory, he has not moved from the natural theory. john: it is really interesting how the whole thing flipped in the space of three days after one conversation in which some notable people like robert redfield were not invited. griff, great to see you. thanks. sandra: alleged censoring of covid narratives, after the biden administration was restrict today talking to social media companies about content found on their platforms. the white house now asking a federal appeals court to block that order, in a case some legal experts expect to make its way to the supreme court. let s bring in missouri attorney general andrew bailey. he co-filed the original lawsuit against the biden administration, clearly because you, saw, saw it as an
doctors anthony fauci and francis collins to suppress the lab leak theory. there was not prompting to disprove or dismiss a potential lab leak. republicans pressed on a sudden change of theory following a conference call with doctors fauci and collins. what this committee is trying to get to the bottom of what happened within that three-day period between the conference call and the paper? well, we examined the genomes more closely, we looked at other coronavirus and there was some new data. republicans also highlighted the disconnect between the findings of the intel community. the department of energy and the fbi directly contradict your position. how do you bring that together? i think the you could say that our conclusions completely contradict their conclusions, too. now, one thing lawmakers seem to unanimously agree upon, bret is, that we may never know with 100 percent certainty the origins of covid without the full and honest cooperation of
investigation. it takes us back to the earliest days of the pandemic, if there was an effort to suppress the lab leak theory, the chairman of the house select committee brad within wenstrup asked for a paper. sought to discredit the lab leak theory working closely with doctors fauci and collins. he wants the messages about june 30th, two days from now. when you try and suppress a theory, scientific theory, a lab leak theory then you suppress the entire scientific discourse. the question is, why? wenstrup wants the authors to appear on july 11th. democrats aren t on board. they say it s an effort to vilify doctors fauci and
The Trump campaign is defending itself from one of DeSantis' attacks concerning Fauci by presenting research on his own history of praising the doctor.