Live Breaking News & Updates on District Consumer Commission At Delhi

The Supreme Court has been moved in a PIL challenging inaction of the government in failing to appoint President, Members and Staff before District Consumer Dispute Redressal Commissions and State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commissions across India.
The plea by petitioner-law student Saloni Gautam, through advocates Dushyant Tiwari, Om Prakash Parihar, avers that on 20.07.2020 the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 came into force and the 2019 Act also changed the pecuniary jurisdiction for the District, State and National Commissions, respectively. The pecuniary limit for the District Commission has been increased to up to Rs.1 Crore from up to Rs. 20 Lakhs; for State Commission it has been increased to up to Rs.10 Crores from up to Rs.1 Crore; and for National Commission the pecuniary jurisdiction has been increased to over and above Rs.10 Crores as against Rs.1 Crore in the 1986 Act. Therefore, the counsel for the Petitioner, on the instruction received from her sent an RTI d ....

Jammu And Kashmir , Uttar Pradesh , Prakash Parihar , Ajoy Hazarika , Dushyant Tiwari , Saloni Gautam , Honble Orissa High Court , Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission , District Consumer Commission At Delhi , Commission At Chandigarh , Honble Court , District Commission , District Consumer Forum , Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission , National Commission , Delhi State Disputes Redressal Commission , Consumer Commission , Karnataka State Commission , High Court , Consumer Protection Act , National Commissions , State Commission , Consumer Commissions , District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forums , District Consumer Disputes Redressal , High Courts ,