It is friday and we have got a fantastic night crap grew recapping week it was, about lets talk about the day that is and we saw major developments in cases that involved the current former president. Judge Tanya Chutkan issued a protective order in dont rams 2020 election interference case after Hearing Arguments from the government and trump. She put everything that has to do with witnesses in the compartment of it and sensitive information. Not just grand jury witnesses, anyone that the government had interviewed. That is the first thing. And the second thing is that, even as she gave a negative to the Trump Defense team of not defining everything as sensitive materials, she took it away by making clear that anything that the government was concerned about in terms of both impairing the jury pool and also going after witnesses, would violate the order anyways. Judge chutkan also warned trumps lawyers that continued inflammatory statements from the client would only increase the need
Even as she gave a nugget to the Trump Defense team of not defining everything as sensitive materials, she took it away by making clear that anything that the government was concerned about in terms of both impairing the jury pool and also going after witnesses, would violate the order anyways. Judge chutkan also warned trumps lawyers that continued inflammatory statements from their client would only increase the need for a speedy trial. Also, in washington, attorney general Merrick Garland called a surprise Press Conference to announce the appointment of a Special Counsel in the hunter biden probe. Tuesday of this week, mr. Weiss advised me that, in his judgment, his investigation had reached a stage at which he should continue his work as a Special Counsel. And he asked to be so appointed. Upon considering his request, as well as the extraordinary circumstances relating to this matter, i have concluded that it is in the Public Interest to appoint him as Special Counsel. The white ho
he goes, we don t have a technology problem, we have an ownership problem. bingo. which is a really interesting question to me. when you start talking about the studios having a eye that does the work of the rioters, the rioters could have the a.i. that does their work for them. you are getting abstract. bring out that distribution idea, i don t know, maybe is to do start have the norm monopoly they think they have. i agree, let s say you have what substack did for reuters about either go. let s say you have that for people who can create scripted content. i don t know where that is, i m not the one coming up with it, but it is not that there is no chance that could come up. ultimately, you have these rioters and they are the ones who are, if a.i. will hurt people who are not good at their jobs, but people who are good at their jobs and able to learn how to use a.i..
i. that does their work for them. you are getting abstract. bring out that distribution idea, i don t know, maybe is to do start have the norm monopoly they think they have. i agree, let s say you have what substack did for reuters about either go. let s say you have that for people who can create scripted content. i don t know where that is, i m not the one coming up with it, but it is not that there is no chance that could come up. ultimately, you have these rioters and they are the ones who are, if a. i. will hurt people who are not good at their jobs, but people who are good at their jobs and able to learn how to use a. i.. but you re a living example, right? if there weren t all these platform outlet, if there were three network channels, benches would not have a home. because someone would say, well that is not going to play with an audience, and who knows where. that s your podcast. i do. mike drop. mike drop, time for a commercial. why?