semicolon, it is not that bad. how you can sit down and read that i don t know. sean: there s a lot of constitutional issues. the mandate that every american has insurance. and the idea that is this constitutional that one state gets exemptions and another state doesn t. one senator gets bought off and another senator doesn t. it is compromise. that part of it i regretably agree does go on that horse trading does go on. mandate is a big constitutional problem. another big constitutional problem which hasn t gotten as much play as i think it should is the obligations put on the insurance industry, with the supreme court s jurisprudence on how much government can impose on people s private property. the american people are gonna look at this process, this reconciliation, they don t understand it we used it before. they are gonna say, we already don t understand it
committee room, the cameras were going and they got to see the disrespect and the manner in which republican ideas are treated when they are put on the fable for discussion. and that discussion doesn t on the table for discussion and that discussion doesn t happen. sean: congressman your thoughts? i agree. he belittled the fact that we had the bill on the table in front of us. we are legislators and talking about points in these bills. so, yes, i think he really was somewhat condescending about those things. we wanted to have a real substantive dialogue on these issues and highlight where we stand, where they stand, what those differences are and how can we bridge those, if possible? sean: very impressive, including the both of you and paul ryan and eric cantor, i thought that was a good group of republicans. you went in with a strong strategy. we the media says it is a draw,
committee room, the cameras were going and they got to see the disrespect and the manner in which republican ideas are treated when they are put on the fable for discussion. and that discussion doesn t on the table for discussion and that discussion doesn t happen. sean: congressman your thoughts? i agree. he belittled the fact that we had the bill on the table in front of us. we are legislators and talking about points in these bills. so, yes, i think he really was somewhat condescending about those things. we wanted to have a real substantive dialogue on these issues and highlight where we stand, where they stand, what those differences are and how can we bridge those, if possible? sean: very impressive, including the both of you and paul ryan and eric cantor, i thought that was a good group of republicans. you went in with a strong strategy.
could be other people, also. there s a lot of people out there. there was no collusion. reporter: so in one breath saying he accepts the u.s. intelligence community s findings and then in the next breath he says that it could be other people. wolf, that is what president trump is saying again and again for the better part of a year and a half or so and insisting no collusion. that, of course, what the special counsel is investigating. but when you talk to people close to the president, supporters of the president, we should point out, not democrats here, they say that the president is so hung up on the idea that he did not win the election or didn t win it fairly or squarely and so hung up on the possibility of collusion that is what he s latching on to. wolf, all this discussion doesn t do one thing and give an insignature of what president trump and president putin talked about during their private meeting. this cleanup exercise here today is all about his public press conference.