That said, we end the year with a bang by hosting todays guest who will discuss his significant and timely book, making the modern american fiscal state law, politics and the rise of progressive taxation, 18771929. Published by Cambridge University press. We will resume this talk on january 15 when we host rebecca edwards, professor of history. Her talk is titled, sex on the frontier fertility in americas antebellum empire. Rebecca edwards is a very eminent historian who would you would expect to get quite a draw from, but a presentation of that title, i think this is something that cannot be missed. Professor mehrotra is the associate dean for research, professor of law. A fellow at Indiana University. He received his j. D. At Georgetown University law center and his ph. D. At the university of chicago. He has served as the codirector of the Indiana University center of law, society and culture. Before arriving at Indiana University, he was a doctoral fellow at the American War Founda
Im richard mcculley. Todays talk is the last of 2014. A year when weve really been treated to some splendid presentations by some of the centers most significant researchers. That said, we end the year with a bang by hosting todays guest who will discuss his significant and timely book, making the modern american fiscal state law, politics and the rise of progressive taxation, 18771929. Published by Cambridge University press. We will resume this talk on january 15 when we host rebecca edwards, professor of history. Her talk is titled, sex on the frontier fertility in americas antebellum empire. Rebecca edwards is a very eminent historian who would you would expect to get quite but a presentation of that title, i think this is something they cannot be missed. Professor mehrotra is the associate dean for research, professor of law. A fellow at Indiana University. He received his j. D. At Georgetown University law center and his ph. D. At the university of chicago. He has served as the c
Next, legal and tax historian discusses is both making the modern american fiscal state. Law, politics and the rise of progressive taxation. 1877 to 1929. He explains how and why the United States shifted from generating most of its revenue from aggressive consumption taxes to a more direct and progressive tax on income with the passage of the 16th amendment. The National Archives center for legislative archives posted this event in december 2014. Thank you for attending todays researcher talk. Im richard mcculley, todays top is the last of 2014. A year when weve really been treated to some splendid presentations by some of the centers most significant researchers. That said, we end the year with a bang and todays guest will discuss his significant and timely book, making the modern american fiscal state. Law, politics and the rise of progressive taxation, 1877 to 1929. Published by Cambridge University press. We will resume this talk on january 15th when we host rebecca edwards. Profe
To equate and eventually end this apartment peach met process. This is dead on arrival in the senate. So they look dead on arrival but the vote was not technically at iran pauls motion but it was to table it for their few senators like rob portman who said click declared unconstitutional. Its on both sides is it possible five or more vote to convict. Its possible. Itssa almost certain to end in another acquittal. Never trust on february 9 presold whole lot about what it is going to look like. Republicans certainly do not want to have a lot of time spent will see what happens in the next few weeks how many senators are needed to convict . You need 67ou senators of everybody shows up, two thirds of the people who show up and vote. Those have to devote to convict. But it is never happened before with the president or expresident. Ed sue needs 17 Senate Republicans to vote to convict. We had five who sort of crossed party lines yesterday to get rid of iran pauls motion. Thats a dozen short
You see yourself voting in the next couple of days when and if this takes place . Pedro i urge my republican colleagues to keep their promise to the American People to do they said they would do in 2016 and that if they break their word and i made that statement very clear before judge blair was nominated and from what i consider to be in a legitimate process. Republicans have broken their word and i tried to hold them to the promise in some what the president ial election. Its over her becoming a judge. So my feeling is yes so even though they would not have been my choice she has a record as an academic at notre dame and i viewed her to be qualified for the Appellate Court thats very different than the Supreme Court but ive often voted for people one position and voted against them for another position i dont think they are suited. And for some reason republicans decide one of their word reic and with that illuminating parts to have parttime that gun rights are more important were Ju