member state was attacked. it brings me to my question. why didn t argentina s 1982 invasion of the british-controlled falkland islands trig gr natur trigge nato s article 5? britain declined help, the united states vetoed, south hemisphere attacks don t couth, or everyone forgot about it. my book of the week is called prisoners of geography. it explains russia, ukraine, kashmir, tibet, iraq all through the rich lands of the map. the answer to my question this week is c. while nato considers any armed attack to be an attack against all members, article 5 only says
to treat an attack on one ally as an attack on all once. when member states supported the united states after 9/11. but that wasn t the first time a member state was attacked. it brings me to my question. why didn t argentina s 1982 invasion of the british-controlled forkland islands trigger article 5? britain declined help. the u.s. vetoed, attacks in the southern hem center don t count, or everyone forgot about it? my book of the week is prisoners of geography. this is a good idea speshabuper executed. it explains the world starting with geography, russia, ukraine, iraq, all through the rich lands of the map. the answer to my gps challenge this week is c, while nato s