the district court s decision and regret that the supreme court has declined to issue this stay. dhs has appealed the district court s order and will continue to vigorously challenge it. we are also though in the to, b proceed with means by which we abide by the ruling. does that then mean negotiations are under way on returning to the migrant protection protocol? the department of state, with dhs support, is engaging in diplomatic discussions with the government of mexico as part of our efforts to implement the court s order, and i would note, i should have said this earlier. our point of view continues to be that this program was not implemented in a moral way. it was inefficient. it used resources by cbp resources, it led to a backlog in the system and it is
0 these are known passport holders. okay. but have have lprs also been contacted? yes. and what about siv applicants, people who are we re in contact will we get i m sorry. i don t expect you to have all of it, but then, you know, since this whole thing began there s been a lot of criticism of the administration over how it handled it and there s been a lot of pushback from people within the administration about the hand that you were basically dealt or what you say you were dealt by the previous to deal with the taliban in terms of the siv program in terms of the broader refugee program. you guys have been in office for eight months. it s been five months since the president s decision was made. is there anything about the shortcomings have about been so readily identified by all sorts of people that you are actually willing to take responsibility for yourselves? thanks, matt. let me say two things. with regards to numbers in these different categories, as you ve