Live Breaking News & Updates on Deters Future Crimes
Stay updated with breaking news from Deters future crimes. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Were some of the greatest attacks on democracy in u. S. History, yet it can be easy to forget that all the horror, reaction, discussion, and coverage, for all the trials of people that stormed the capitol and the convictions of seditionists there was no coup probe of indictment for years. The man who led the january 6th rally, impeached for inciting an insurrection, that man, two years after those events, the person at the center of it all was not facing a serious coup probe let alone charges. Reporting shows quite the opposite. Not only was he not facing that, but the fbi and doj avoiding investigating trump for optics and review of the evidence. We all know that. That was the status quo for years. So, in our Special Report tonight, lets begin with the very simple question what changed . One thing, and its the kind of change in Law Enforcement that can change everything as ....
Degrees who are in this much hot water. and i think you and i and any fair person would respect that lawyers have a zealous advocacy duty among other roles to play, but what do you see in whether that minority of people, the people who actually clashed with the mcgahn s and the subsequent white house council as narrated by the jan 6th committee crossed the line? do you think they crossed the line? do you think it s fair game? do you think mr. eastman and mr. giuliani were just giving advice? apparently jack smith believed they were conspirators in the case, and that was the term he used in the case. so it remains to be seen as to whether they re charged with any crimes there. and certainly, you know, they ve used the crime fraud exception to bring these folks in and talk about what they had said, and that s something to break through the attorney/client privilege. so i do think there if i m ....
Who based on what they were asked to do went into the elector fraud. i mention both lawyers because they have for whatever reason interlocking defense, which is, hey, we didn t mean it. it s not really fraud if we were kind of just playing around. take a listen. the attorney general has charged these individuals with essentially forgery in addition to uttering a publishing and other similar crimes. the problem is we would maintain it s not a forgery. no one in their right mind, i believe, whether it could be in washington, d.c., or michigan would believe that document would trump the certificate of election that was rightfully sent. you know, james, my job is to ask the questions, so i m going to just ask it is this a real legal defense that a crappy ....
Demonstrated a rescue for legal limits, the kind of measured professional humility. and again, we ve gone through all of this and picked out the keys for you. this is something he has spoken about in a sometimes baffling legal lines that are drawn for pursuing politicians. folk who is commit these crimes are sophisticated individuals, and by the large, they give the money and receive the money, benefits in all sort of complicated forms that make it not nearly as stark, not easy to report in five lines in a newspaper article. because of that, because of how the crimes are committed, because they re often committed by sophisticated people with great means, we do need laws that are broad enough to reach conduct . i mean, right now under the honor services statute as it exists, we cannot charge undisclosed conflicts of ....
Up before the election, and i think he s recognizing the fact that he has to secure a quick conviction here and is shaping indictments to do that. what do you see in his approach at the hague? as mentioned it would be equally valid to have a sort of loud or strong or more a motive presentation, certainly you and i have been around cases where a prosecutor dealing with crimes with terrible actions relatable or empathetic victims takes that tact. what do you think of the tact he took? i think we ll look at some of that footage of him at the hague. look, the person he s taking is the right approach in my opinion. when you have the evidence, meticulously going through and pointing at the evidence is focusing on the evidence is the way to go. prosecutors who are full of bombast typically don t often have the goods on the other side. i think what jack smith is ....