An all of the above approach to american energy. For a country to continue benefit from Nuclear Energy we need the nrc to be an effective, efficient and predictable regulator. The nrc nrcs efficiency prince of good regulations states quote, the american taxpayer, the rate and consumer and licensees are all entitled to the best possible management and administration of regulatory activities. I agree. It is our committees responsively to assess the agencies performance. The nrc Safety Mission is paramount, the nrc must execute that mission in a fiscally responsible and timely fashion. My home state of wyoming plays a key role in the american Nuclear Energy supply. It produces more uranium than any other state. I want to commend the commission for agreeing to extend the duration of uranium recovery licenses from ten years to 20 20 years. This is an important recognition that the Regulatory Burden placed on these facilities is disproportionately high given how the nrc considers their opera
If you have a lot of causalities two is okay. But the number of people adversely impacted by dedicate it creates an impact of loss of human life its prefer able to use a hire classification of 3, in fact, it was done to the modern art we believe that the classification should be used as 3 not 2 and for that reason if you do use the classification of 3 the capacity of the facility must be higher than contemplated when you use a lower classification so because of the unique classifications of this facility and its location to the pg e building we believe that the new standards of San Francisco require a heightened design. So that moongdz you minimize Property Damage and you undercut the realignscy program that San Francisco has spent a lot of money pursing. We saw to a smaller degree at northridge in 193 and nooud entire neighborhoods became ghost turns down. A perfectly Good Building was red tagged. The entire neighborhood was disputing shut down that diversifying contract is not resili
Because those policies but because of the proximity of those essential pg e workstation located on the cooperate. This has not been well addressed in the opposing papers. This pg e facility is the principal source of electrical power for the downtown San Francisco business district. Theres no back up. This is pg e recommendation when they were working on an upgrade. To the submittals they estimated if that facility goes down there will be 150 million lost in San Francisco. My clients ray a half a block away would lose power and not be operational. It turns out in the cpc filing if this facility goes down activist its called the embarcadero station the loss from San Francisco will be 3. 5 billion. We have an important facility located next to the property highrise. We believe under the circumstances in addition to the new Policies Incorporated in your general plan the proximity to the pg e facility requires is a different occupancy clarification welcome back be used such as used was mod
Able to use a hire classification of 3, in fact, it was done to the modern art we believe that the classification should be used as 3 not 2 and for that reason if you do use the classification of 3 the capacity of the facility must be higher than contemplated when you use a lower classification so because of the unique classifications of this facility and its location to the pg e building we believe that the new standards of San Francisco require a heightened design. So that moongdz you minimize Property Damage and you undercut the realignscy program that San Francisco has spent a lot of money pursing. We saw to a smaller degree at northridge in 193 and nooud entire neighborhoods became ghost turns down. A perfectly Good Building was red tagged. The entire neighborhood was disputing shut down that diversifying contract is not resilient in San Francisco. Not only are we trying to make sure that 9 resident can return to their property after an earthquake to make sure that the entire neig
The former leaseholder of Rotorua's 'iconic' Blue Baths says new government advice shows the council could have left the building open while a plan was made for its future.