Live Breaking News & Updates on Deposited Securities
Stay updated with breaking news from Deposited securities. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Government to target an american citizen for political gain and at the same time withheld without justification $391 million in military aid for a vulnerable ukraine that remains at war with russian backed separatists in the east. why should it matter? perhaps ronald reagan posited the best answer when he delivered a speech at the foot of it berlin wall in 1987 and stated east and west do not mistrust each other because we are armed. we are arm because we mistrust each other. and our differences are not about weapons but about liberty. that is at the heart of the trump-ukraine scandal. liberty, national security, abuse of power. america is the leader of the ....
Self and especially ones re-election. in the debates around the framing of the constitution the big question about the impeachment power was do we really need it or is it enough because the president will have to stand for re-election if it s going to be ahead of him. and the answer to that was what if he corrupts the election process? what if he uses his power to reframe the election so that he rigs the system? we can t afford to wait. that was the whole reason not to wait for the election to take place. so when we hear some republicans saying that abuse of power is not a crime, they re missing the point. it is the highest crime against the constitution. and in this case the impeachment articles are carefully written to show the aggravating circumstances. ....
Without justification $391 million in military aid for a vulnerable ukraine that remains at war with russian backed separatists in the east. why should it matter? perhaps ronald reagan posited the best answer when he delivered a speech at the foot of it berlin wall in 1987 and stated east and west do not mistrust each other because we are armed. we are arm because we mistrust each other. and our differences are not about weapons but about liberty. that is at the heart of the trump-ukraine scandal. liberty, national security, abuse of power. america is the leader of the free world. we play that role because it is in the best interests of the ....
Democrats are known for only impeaching president trump as opposed to legislation. political arguments, essentially. i don t subscribe to those political arguments. i don t think people should be making them and i don t think people should be thinking them. what we ought to think about is, what does it mean to this office if we don t impeach the president based on the facts before us. what does it mean if we do impeach the president? what will this tell future presidents about what they can get away with? what does this tell the american people about what they should now expect in their chief executive? what about the idea i ve heard this posited, that if you took bolton and everybody to court, mulvaney the supreme court has never weighed in on if such a thing they ve never made a decision about where executive privilege ends and where it begins when it comes to people in the white house testifying, being forced to testify before congress, it would go before the supreme court ....
Hispanics. blum has vowed to appeal that decision and many believe it will end with a national showdown at a supreme court dominated by conservatives, many of whom are long-time skeptics of affirmative action. one of the ironies of the harvard case is while it pretends to be about discrimination against asian-americans in admissions, it s really not. it s really an attack on affirmative action for blacks and hispanics. but many colleges feel that affirmative action is still badly needed in admissions. a recent analysis done by the new york times found that black and hispanic students were more underrepresented at elite colleges than 35 years earlier. at the center of all this is a complex question with no easy answer. if, as thomas jefferson once posited, we should have a meritocracy, what he called an aristocracy of talent, then ....