chief of staff who did not request a part in. talking about mick mulvaney one of the veterans with the new evidence does change things because it links trump to the armed violence in advance. he very simply and plainly lays out how and first i want to show it in two parts how in many other debates over donald trump, his old boss including debates over trump s at times violent speeches has previously defended his former boss. i have seen him accused of violence with no violence at all so i have been defending him. i have been defending him. his mind has changed and now he says in public because of the new evidence that trump new they were armed and trumped push them on anyway. after yesterday when she testified that he knew there were guns on property and he still encouraged people to go to the capital, that changes my mind. that changes his mind. he is not the ultimate arbiter that it striking because he held the same post as mark meadows who is now under investigatio
picks. and then, the comedy of george karlyn. possibly more relevant today than ever before. my interview with kelly karlyn on her father s legacy, as the 11th hour gets underway on this thursday night. good evening once again, i am stephanie ruhle. 173 days until the midterm elections. tonight, the january 6th committee wants to talk to another republican congressman. the panel has asked georgia congressman, barry loudermilk to come in for an interview. a capitol tour that says it took place on january 5th, the day before the riot. the capital was close at the time because of the pandemic. the committee writes this. based on our review of evidence, and the select committee s possession, we believe to have information regarding a tour you lead through parts of the capitol complex on january 5th. the committee absent has evidence directly contradicting claims from republicans who insisted that security video showed no towards before the attack. allegations about the towards we
good evening once again, i am stephanie ruhle. 173 days until the midterm elections. tonight, the january 6th committee wants to talk to another republican congressman. the panel has asked georgia congressman, barry loudermilk to come in for an interview. a capitol tour that says it took place on january 5th, the day before the riot. the capital was close at the time because of the pandemic. the committee writes this. based on our review of evidence, and the select committee s possession, we believe to have information regarding a tour you lead through parts of the capitol complex on january 5th. the committee absent has evidence directly contradicting claims from republicans who insisted that security video showed no towards before the attack. allegations about the towards were made days before the riot. here is what she said way back then. i also intend to see that those members of congress embedded them. those members of congress comin
anyone you want but right here we are going to walk down to the capital because he will never take back our country with weakness. trump said that innocently or ignorantly, it could be hard but the same former prosecutor notes the encouragement of weapons before that speech and said it s now the smoking gun to prove intent to incite. then there is being a traitor, sedition, a.k.a., seditious conspiracy. we know attorney general garland is a cautious and careful lawyer and a former judge and we also know his justice department has found sufficient evidence that will prove sedition and we know that because some insurrectionist have been indicted. there are veteran prosecutors in the new testimony evidence that could link others to the sedition conspiracy. the justice department veteran
so let s discuss, and bring in our dear friend neil, department veteran, and former general during the obama administration. he has argued dozens of cases before the u.s. supreme court. neil, help us out, this is serious. this law goes even further than the one in texas, and that is when it was modeled after. so can you walk us through it? this kind of law is what the justice alito draft opinion that was leaked a couple of weeks ago, if that becomes the law, this is what is going to happen in the states like oklahoma. the illegal law was about a mississippi law restricting abortion at 15 weeks. the reasoning in the draft that he wrote permits this law, which as you say, is easily the most restrictive law in the country. it is basically a flat ban on abortion, coupled with a texas style vigilante provision. so if you are in oklahoma, you can sue someone and get $10,