Dents Phied News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Stay updated with breaking news from Dents phied. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Top News In Dents Phied Today - Breaking & Trending Today
Faith in mueller. A lot of people. That is mueller saying, curious to see if democrats will accept this conclusion since that came from mueller. On obstruction, katy, i fully understand if there is a debate and dispute over this, because this was not muellers definitive word. This was bob barrs word. This is where theyll be a fight. Again, politically the toothpaste is already out of the tube as they say. Yeah. So, you know, this isnt getting resolved in this country until november 2020. No doubt about that. I think what we can take from this is that the investigations will continue in congress, but ultimately and who knows how long it will take to potentially see the rest of this report, or what we are able to see, but ultimately this is going to go to voters in 2020 and what the president s going to do, chuck, and the Steve Bannons made this clear and anybody who followed the 2016 campaign would assume as well, hes going to use t ....
Conspiracy or collusion. the statute says pending proceeding. to me that s not controlling whatsoever. the big, bizarre thing here is that bob mueller does all of this work and on obstruction, the most obvious happening in plain sight. apparently not allowed to give an opinion. are you saying not allowed or choose not to? i don t really know. that s the big question for me. as i looked at this, i was confused by that. why didn t he make an opinion about that? he s an experienced prosecutor. doug what do you think? i agree with the statement on the law. in other words, if you re investigating something and i say to a witness, go in there and lie that can be obstruction. regard l regard toms makes a good point. the main issue a question of coordination or collusion, and they conclude fairly strongly, face it, put politics aside a minute legally. obstruction is that much weaker ....
Couldn t also don t phi the material in a similar time frame. i expect them to apply the same expediency to the review process. eastern the review process can go to the court tomorrow i want the entire report released. that s not hard to do. this i think appears to be a little more of a delay than anything else. again, i hate saying that, but i have to say, given what barr found on obstruction of justice, i think all of us should be very concerned about the even-handedness of the way this investigation was treated. you were someone that said previously we should be trusting bill barr. what about those who may be listening now saying that because bill barr didn t come up with the conclusion that you might have wanted him to, not saying you had a stake in this one way or the other, thinking that now you say you don t trust him? first of all i never said every american should trust barr. i hoped he would do the right thing on friday when he released ....
Investigation thorough from a law enforcement and investigating stantpoint. another thing to bring up. key and germane to the conversation you re having here, katy. the justice department typically almost never brings an obstruction of justice charge if not an underlying crime. in this particular instance they have determined there was no coordination between the trump campaign or the president as a candidate and the russian government. if there s no underlying crime here there s no typically no obstruction case that would be brought. what is interesting, what it doesn t explicitly say in the letter from a.g. barr is whether or not those efforts, potential efforts to obstruct justice, in some way hindered the investigation. something actually i d like to know. that would be important here whether or not some of the things that this is referred to do you not think that was addressed yesterday or the day before when william barp said ....
The initial statement. i thought that was a good statement. but i don t think i ve ever gone further than that. i do think that here we do, i think there is reason to be very concerned given what he wrote here. that you have a two-year investigation and mueller doesn t make the final determination. says there s evidence on both sides and then you have barr swoop in and within 48 hours make a decision. there is something deeply troubling about that, and it s a same troubling thing dents phied during the barr hearings. wrote a kooky 19-page memo saying presidents can t obstruct justice. i m hoareds with is the same part of that ludicrous legal view. i don t know what his ultimate decisions were here because he doesn t tell us and that s the point. the american public needs to know, congress needs to know how exactly did he conclude there was no obstruction of justice and if it s really about the lack of intent on the part of ....