coming up at 2:30, talking books heads to the edinburgh festival, where kirsty wark interviews author jing jing lee. good afternoon. the labour leader, jeremy corbyn, has sought to play down divisions in his top team, after one of his key aides announced he s resigning. it comes after a turbulent start to the labour party conference, where there s been a failed attempt to oust mr corbyn‘s deputy, tom watson, and further splits over brexit. here s our political correspondent, nick eardley. not everything here is going according to plan. jeremy corbyn wants to persuade you he is ready for power, but one of his key aides has raised concerns. andrew fisher, still by mr corbyn‘s side this morning, is quitting, privately accusing the leader s team of a blizzard of lies and saying he no longer has faith in them. i have obviously seen the words that andrew wrote, and i discussed them with him at some length. why do you think he said that? i think he said that because he was extre
study the view about whether they wish to table amendments to a bill whose basic subject matter was well-known to them, they would be able to do that probably at least closely to his own level of acceptability. his own standard. the second point is it is is here that the bill today and there are several precedents. those bills are ordinarily been government bills and very often concerning northern ireland. it is unusual, except, what is isn t is disorderly. the honorable gentleman raised important questions about money resolution and the queen s consent. yes, this bill is different but i have of course consulted the clerk of legislation and other senior clerks on whose procedural expertise we regularly call. my ruling on wednesday the third of april, 2019 in respect to the earlier bill which the honorable atleman referenced was column131 that the european union does not require a ways and means motion or a money resolution. extending the theory under article 50 would continue
no time left. stand onherever we this issue, we know there is little time left and following the us the decision, there is even less time that would have been available previously. therefore, i hope we will treat each other, recognizing we have strongly held views with respect and consideration during this debate. the purpose of the bill is very simple. it is to ensure that the united kingdom does not leave the european union on the 31st of october without an agreement. the bill has wide cross party support. integrate pleasure to be involved with the honorable member and it s backed by members who have very different views on how the matter of brexit should finally a result including, members who, until very recently, were senior members of the cabinet. you could describe it as a somewhat unlikely alliance but what unites us is a conviction that there is no mandate for no deal, and the consequences for the economy and for our country would be highly damaging. those suppor
the british house of commons on the bill to block a no deal brexit, despite the objections of british by mr. boris johnson. this portion of the debate is just under two hours. thank you very much indeed, mr. speaker. i beg to move the bill be re ad for a second time. start to say at the that every single member of this house, whatever the with a hold on the fundamental political question is trying as they see best to act international interest and in the national interest and of their constituents. the problem is each of us here today as a slightly different view of what those best interests are, so i hope we can debate this bill in what i recognize is a short amount of time. i i may respond to the point, quote the right honorable member who on the third of april in the house said it can only be done at high-speed because there is no time left. i think wherever we stand on this issue, we know there is very little time left. following the decision on provocation, there is
the problem, the reason we of course, theis we have slightly different views of what those test interest are best interests are. i could do no better than to quote the honorable member who on the third of april in the house said it could only be done at high-speed because there is no time left. stand onherever we this issue, we know there is little time left and following the us the decision, there is even less time that would have been available previously. therefore, i hope we will treat each other, recognizing we have strongly held views with respect and consideration during this debate. the purpose of the bill is very simple. it is to ensure that the united kingdom does not leave the european union on the 31st of october without an agreement. the bill has wide cross party support. integrate pleasure to be involved with the honorable member and it s backed by members who have very different views on how the matter of brexit should finally a result including, members