Mobile made free event. With our business internet, new and existing customers can get one year of unlimited mobile for free. Its our best internet. Powered by The Next Generation 10g network and with 99. 9 reliability. Plus one line of free mobile for an entire year. Its the mobile made free eventhappening now. Get started for just 49. 99 a month. Plus, ask how to get one free line of unlimited mobile. Comcast business, powering possibilities. Our special breaking News Coverage continues now of the third, yes, third criminal indictment of former President Donald Trump. Im lara coates. And im erin burnett. The news tonight still stunning, even though people expected an indictment to come. Right now its here. You have to let it sink in. The 45th president indicted by a Federal Grand Jury in jack smiths investigation into efforts to overturn the 2020 election. And its not lost on anyone that while trump is facing charges over the last election, he is, of course, in the middle of his reel
regarding the grant termination. does that violate policy? it was inappropriate for him to go doing that for a grantee as a conflict of interest, among other things. on march 29, 2021, dr. morens edited a letter that dr. das yak was sending to nih. does that violate policy? yes. he provided him with advice regarding how to mislead nih on eco health s late progress report. does that violate policy? it was wrong and inappropriate and violated policy. on december 7th, 2021, dr. morens wrote to the chair of eco health s board of directors to quote put in a word, end quote, for the doctor. does that violate policy? should not have done that. that was wrong. it violates policy. i m not sure of a specific policy. i imagine it does. he should not have been doing that. in addition to all those actions dr. morens wrote to the doctor peter from tony s recent comments to me they are trying to protect you, end quote. did you ever talk to dr. morens about dr. daczak and e
systems of accountability have become systems of plausible denia deniability. your name is on every grant but absolve yourself of responsibility by saying it goes to this committee that s you know, that has a number of people on it and approved in block and there is no accountability for anything. any of the taxpayer dollars that are going forth. i disagree, congressman. if you look at the number of grants, we fund thousands of grants. it would be physically impossible for me to go through every single grant in a detailed way to understand it. that is true not only for me but for virtually every institute at the nih. why does your signature go on it somebody has to sign it and you trust the expertise and competence of the staff that go over it. gentleman s time is expired. recognize ms. ross from north carolina for five minutes. thank you, mr. chairman.
every road that says common sense, common sense, obvious, obvious. and go lie thick one over here. you got the attorney general, got the deputy attorney general, white house counsel, you re a former white house lawyer. all the peoples including the secretary of state and beyond what you are saying is not true. and the complaint says you know that s not true. can you really say look, i was just following my council. or were they following him? again, i think that s why he is the only named defendant in this case. they want to make it clear that he was the one driving this. he got advice from a number of folks that said very credible, some of the best lawyers in constitutional scholars in washington, no, you can t do that. and yet he went to others, he got a second opinion. and was he driving the conversation to get the answer he wanted? or was he really seeking council. this idea of plausible denia